From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] drivers: usb: otg: make twl6030_usb as a comparator driver to omap_usb2 Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 12:01:30 -0700 Message-ID: <20121026190129.GP11908@atomide.com> References: <1346943430-18236-1-git-send-email-kishon@ti.com> <1346943430-18236-3-git-send-email-kishon@ti.com> <508AA94B.10504@ti.com> <508AAA85.6070905@ti.com> <508ACF0B.60808@ti.com> <508AD1E7.3080101@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-04-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.74]:65523 "EHLO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759014Ab2JZTBi (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Oct 2012 15:01:38 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <508AD1E7.3080101@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Benoit Cousson Cc: Paul Walmsley , Roger Quadros , "ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY" , Rabin Vincent , balbi@ti.com, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org * Benoit Cousson [121026 11:11]: > On 10/26/2012 07:57 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > > > On 10/26/2012 07:54 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote: > >> On Fri, 26 Oct 2012, Benoit Cousson wrote: > >> > >>> On 10/26/2012 05:16 PM, Roger Quadros wrote: > >>> > >>>> I still can't get musb to work on 3.7-rc2. Apparently it is still > >>>> missing the patches from Benoit's for_3.7/dts_part2. > >>>> > >>>> Maybe I just need to wait for it to be merged? > >>> > >>> They are now in a for_3.8/dts. Unfortunately, one patch that was adding > >>> ctrl_module address in the USB data was rejected and thus I'm not sure > >>> it will work without that. > >> > >> For v3.7-rc timeframe, looks like it's waiting on an ack from you: > >> > >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg201028.html > > > > Oups, I missed that one. But I thought Roger was mentioning the DT patch > > and not that one. > > > > Anyway, I will answer to Tony. Thanks for the reminder Paul. > > Well, in fact, I cannot even find the original email in my mailbox :-( > I was banned again from linux-omap around that time, so that might be > the reason. > > So please take that hacky patch if it prevents the regression. OK yes it seems like that's the only option we have until omap4 is device tree only. Regards, Tony From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 12:01:30 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 2/5] drivers: usb: otg: make twl6030_usb as a comparator driver to omap_usb2 In-Reply-To: <508AD1E7.3080101@ti.com> References: <1346943430-18236-1-git-send-email-kishon@ti.com> <1346943430-18236-3-git-send-email-kishon@ti.com> <508AA94B.10504@ti.com> <508AAA85.6070905@ti.com> <508ACF0B.60808@ti.com> <508AD1E7.3080101@ti.com> Message-ID: <20121026190129.GP11908@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Benoit Cousson [121026 11:11]: > On 10/26/2012 07:57 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > > > On 10/26/2012 07:54 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote: > >> On Fri, 26 Oct 2012, Benoit Cousson wrote: > >> > >>> On 10/26/2012 05:16 PM, Roger Quadros wrote: > >>> > >>>> I still can't get musb to work on 3.7-rc2. Apparently it is still > >>>> missing the patches from Benoit's for_3.7/dts_part2. > >>>> > >>>> Maybe I just need to wait for it to be merged? > >>> > >>> They are now in a for_3.8/dts. Unfortunately, one patch that was adding > >>> ctrl_module address in the USB data was rejected and thus I'm not sure > >>> it will work without that. > >> > >> For v3.7-rc timeframe, looks like it's waiting on an ack from you: > >> > >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg201028.html > > > > Oups, I missed that one. But I thought Roger was mentioning the DT patch > > and not that one. > > > > Anyway, I will answer to Tony. Thanks for the reminder Paul. > > Well, in fact, I cannot even find the original email in my mailbox :-( > I was banned again from linux-omap around that time, so that might be > the reason. > > So please take that hacky patch if it prevents the regression. OK yes it seems like that's the only option we have until omap4 is device tree only. Regards, Tony