From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felipe Balbi Subject: Re: OMAP baseline test results for v3.7-rc1 Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 23:15:39 +0300 Message-ID: <20121026201539.GD29548@arwen.pp.htv.fi> References: <20121025101212.GD21217@arwen.pp.htv.fi> Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pQhZXvAqiZgbeUkD" Return-path: Received: from devils.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.153]:35452 "EHLO devils.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966367Ab2JZUVj (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Oct 2012 16:21:39 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121025101212.GD21217@arwen.pp.htv.fi> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Felipe Balbi Cc: Jean Pihet , Paul Walmsley , aaro.koskinen@iki.fi, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, khilman@ti.com --pQhZXvAqiZgbeUkD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 01:12:12PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > Hi, >=20 > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 09:23:03PM +0200, Jean Pihet wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > > On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, Jean Pihet wrote: > > > > > >> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Jean Pihet wrote: > > >> > > >> > Do you have CPU_IDLE enabled? > > >> FYI the issue is not present with CPU_IDLE enabled. > > > > > > Hmm, how can you tell? I thought you weren't able to reproduce it wi= th > > > CPU_IDLE disabled either? > > I could not reproduce the issue, with and without CPU_IDLE enabled. > > What puzzles me is that the PM QoS code only has influence on the > > states chosen by cpuidle, so the change should not have any impact > > with CPU_IDLE enabled. I reallt need to reproduce the issue. > > Let me try with the same setup as yours (bootloader images, > > omap2pus_defconfig, angstrom roots). >=20 > I just sent a patch to fix a bug I found on OMAP4 panda but while > reading this thread again, I think it could be that it's the same bug > which is just easier to reproduce on Paul's setup. >=20 > Paul, Aaro, can you see if [1] makes the problem go away ? that would be > another reason to push [1] during this -rc cycle. >=20 > [1] http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-omap&m=3D135115602407925&w=3D2 ping --=20 balbi --pQhZXvAqiZgbeUkD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQiu9rAAoJEIaOsuA1yqREdi4P/3j1LteaGo/KpNJCzf8k1U5n 3cfgWCd/ghzw4iQWQgjyiJ7Ay1veMZt6uArAYOZxQhMjLrfZvrg2qsJOeaTlBsIy aMHOygGk24PHRhZHJN/mBC8mDVDHj6uWWbKwciRA80WaZILsYo9BKcRiT/fnO46L WrAPB9gNV1fqEbHMwFvqmuqVBc5eXUgbY9PitaJf+r0hmCzSpc08AyNy1BFkgQOG 9Fn5LXu8vPAN56RrSH/r1Xxn58d8w8zpj8coGC+Y9oITZPEA46PMosvQKfF882MQ k+dJ5c2B7+3IRMClcBs3D49rRJWSNqX+HujFN3P9cbm/qTl+CGWcBCfV2m2/IeuI YElsdbsZAoy+fIgw4lwu1XL1V7c40+aRykQCxWRdJ8iwulaTmpW91KAlP158md5F v4BAJYGxfxxeVGjRqOrrVF9v180vjuf0f17IlSYtF+bLhwPM5uzvYk7cEuDvfv0v HjqRXJK6WttfRLUSHNE9UAhTknwUy/TdgnwcW78ffcM5EWN3AzBAZH4KU9+QWMXu 3luBlIZ9ndAPYVnv70vMMrOJzMhcVVXf6vgzhbSya+TwMd6hJp7CwdtdsNIwDzNu 83QM4obLiu0Zz0HBztgfV2LfyVbh0eSUxo1PHIizVcNJ4vwaOs6jY9VHFP8BGpuM PddZzB1pAMX4C4W551S8 =1jnh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pQhZXvAqiZgbeUkD-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: balbi@ti.com (Felipe Balbi) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 23:15:39 +0300 Subject: OMAP baseline test results for v3.7-rc1 In-Reply-To: <20121025101212.GD21217@arwen.pp.htv.fi> References: <20121025101212.GD21217@arwen.pp.htv.fi> Message-ID: <20121026201539.GD29548@arwen.pp.htv.fi> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 01:12:12PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 09:23:03PM +0200, Jean Pihet wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > > On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, Jean Pihet wrote: > > > > > >> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Jean Pihet wrote: > > >> > > >> > Do you have CPU_IDLE enabled? > > >> FYI the issue is not present with CPU_IDLE enabled. > > > > > > Hmm, how can you tell? I thought you weren't able to reproduce it with > > > CPU_IDLE disabled either? > > I could not reproduce the issue, with and without CPU_IDLE enabled. > > What puzzles me is that the PM QoS code only has influence on the > > states chosen by cpuidle, so the change should not have any impact > > with CPU_IDLE enabled. I reallt need to reproduce the issue. > > Let me try with the same setup as yours (bootloader images, > > omap2pus_defconfig, angstrom roots). > > I just sent a patch to fix a bug I found on OMAP4 panda but while > reading this thread again, I think it could be that it's the same bug > which is just easier to reproduce on Paul's setup. > > Paul, Aaro, can you see if [1] makes the problem go away ? that would be > another reason to push [1] during this -rc cycle. > > [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=135115602407925&w=2 ping -- balbi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: