From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH] vxlan nits Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 07:20:56 -0700 Message-ID: <20121029072056.5faa6db4@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> References: <201210191148.q9JBkm0v018443@lab1.dls> <20121019132815.547a5bb8@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: David L Stevens , David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Vincent Bernat Return-path: Received: from mail.vyatta.com ([76.74.103.46]:60046 "EHLO mail.vyatta.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754751Ab2J2OVr convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:21:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 23:02:20 +0100 Vincent Bernat wrote: > =E2=9D=A6 19 octobre 2012 22:28 CEST, Stephen Hemminger =C2=A0: >=20 > > The plan is to add IPV6 support, in which case group address could > > be IPV6. >=20 > Hi Stephen! >=20 > Is it something that you plan to add soon? The only real question is whether to have one driver do dual stack with one forwarding table, or separate drivers (like GRE). I prefer the form= er. Since the RFC does not include IPv6 yet, there is no rush and the final standard may address some of the corner case issues like fragmentation.