All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Phil White <pwhite@sgi.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/25] xfs: invalidate allocbt blocks moved to the free list
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 17:22:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121030002211.GD30227@caliban.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1351146854-19343-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>

This looks OK by me.

Reviewed-by: Phil White <pwhite@sgi.com>

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 05:33:51PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> 
> When we free a block from the alloc btree tree, we move it to the
> freelist held in the AGFL and mark it busy in the busy extent tree.
> This typically happens when we merge btree blocks.
> 
> Once the transaction is committed and checkpointed, the block can
> remain on the free list for an indefinite amount of time.  Now, this
> isn't the end of the world at this point - if the free list is
> shortened, the buffer is invalidated in the transaction that moves
> it back to free space. If the buffer is allocated as metadata from
> the free list, then all the modifications getted logged, and we have
> no issues, either. And if it gets allocated as userdata direct from
> the freelist, it gets invalidated and so will never get written.
> 
> However, during the time it sits on the free list, pressure on the
> log can cause the AIL to be pushed and the buffer that covers the
> block gets pushed for write. IOWs, we end up writing a freed
> metadata block to disk. Again, this isn't the end of the world
> because we know from the above we are only writing to free space.
> 
> The problem, however, is for validation callbacks. If the block was
> on old btree root block, then the level of the block is going to be
> higher than the current tree root, and so will fail validation.
> There may be other inconsistencies in the block as well, and
> currently we don't care because the block is in free space. Shutting
> down the filesystem because a freed block doesn't pass write
> validation, OTOH, is rather unfriendly.
> 
> So, make sure we always invalidate buffers as they move from the
> free space trees to the free list so that we guarantee they never
> get written to disk while on the free list.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_alloc_btree.c |    2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_alloc_btree.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_alloc_btree.c
> index f1647ca..f7876c6 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_alloc_btree.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_alloc_btree.c
> @@ -121,6 +121,8 @@ xfs_allocbt_free_block(
>  	xfs_extent_busy_insert(cur->bc_tp, be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_seqno), bno, 1,
>  			      XFS_EXTENT_BUSY_SKIP_DISCARD);
>  	xfs_trans_agbtree_delta(cur->bc_tp, -1);
> +
> +	xfs_trans_binval(cur->bc_tp, bp);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 1.7.10

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-10-30 17:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-25  6:33 [PATCH 00/25, V3] xfs: metadata buffer verifiers Dave Chinner
2012-10-25  6:33 ` [PATCH 01/25] xfs: growfs: don't read garbage for new secondary superblocks Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  0:17   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:33 ` [PATCH 02/25] xfs: invalidate allocbt blocks moved to the free list Dave Chinner
2012-10-26  8:47   ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-30  0:22   ` Phil White [this message]
2012-10-25  6:33 ` [PATCH 03/25] xfs: make buffer read verication an IO completion function Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  0:29   ` Phil White
2012-10-30  0:45     ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  0:55       ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:33 ` [PATCH 04/25] xfs: uncached buffer reads need to return an error Dave Chinner
2012-10-26  8:48   ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-30  0:36   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:33 ` [PATCH 05/25] xfs: verify superblocks as they are read from disk Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  0:48   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:33 ` [PATCH 06/25] xfs: verify AGF blocks " Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  0:51   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:33 ` [PATCH 07/25] xfs: verify AGI " Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  0:53   ` Phil White
2012-10-30 22:13     ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-25  6:33 ` [PATCH 08/25] xfs: verify AGFL " Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  1:00   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:33 ` [PATCH 09/25] xfs: verify inode buffers " Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  1:06   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:33 ` [PATCH 10/25] xfs: verify btree blocks " Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  1:14   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 11/25] xfs: verify dquot " Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  1:36   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 12/25] xfs: add verifier callback to directory read code Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  3:15   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 13/25] xfs: factor dir2 block read operations Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  3:23   ` Phil White
2012-10-30 22:16     ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 14/25] xfs: verify dir2 block format buffers Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  3:26   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 15/25] xfs: factor dir2 free block reading Dave Chinner
2012-10-30 13:14   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 16/25] xfs: factor out dir2 data " Dave Chinner
2012-10-30 13:21   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 17/25] xfs: factor dir2 leaf read Dave Chinner
2012-10-30 13:22   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 18/25] xfs: factor and verify attr leaf reads Dave Chinner
2012-10-30 13:26   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 19/25] xfs: add xfs_da_node verification Dave Chinner
2012-10-30 13:30   ` Phil White
2012-10-30 22:23     ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-31  0:23       ` Phil White
2012-10-31  0:50         ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 20/25] xfs: Add verifiers to dir2 data readahead Dave Chinner
2012-10-30 13:31   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 21/25] xfs: add buffer pre-write callback Dave Chinner
2012-10-26  8:50   ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-30 22:30     ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-31 10:20       ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-30 13:32   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 22/25] xfs: add pre-write metadata buffer verifier callbacks Dave Chinner
2012-10-30 13:34   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 23/25] xfs: connect up write verifiers to new buffers Dave Chinner
2012-10-30 13:39   ` Phil White
2012-10-30 22:34     ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 24/25] xfs: convert buffer verifiers to an ops structure Dave Chinner
2012-10-30 13:41   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 25/25] xfs: add write verifiers to log recovery Dave Chinner
2012-10-26  8:54   ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-26 20:31     ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-30 12:23       ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-30 22:08         ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-31 10:19           ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-30 13:44   ` Phil White

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121030002211.GD30227@caliban.engr.sgi.com \
    --to=pwhite@sgi.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.