From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/12] VMCI: event handling implementation. Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:26:05 -0700 Message-ID: <20121030022605.GG1920@kroah.com> References: <20121030005923.17788.21797.stgit@promb-2n-dhcp175.eng.vmware.com> <20121030010420.17788.59187.stgit@promb-2n-dhcp175.eng.vmware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121030010420.17788.59187.stgit@promb-2n-dhcp175.eng.vmware.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: George Zhang Cc: pv-drivers@vmware.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 06:04:27PM -0700, George Zhang wrote: > +static void event_signal_destroy(struct kref *kref) > +{ > + struct vmci_subscription *entry = > + container_of(kref, struct vmci_subscription, kref); > + > + complete(&entry->done); > +} Didn't you just leak memory here? What frees the structure up? thanks, greg k-h From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752679Ab2J3CZN (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Oct 2012 22:25:13 -0400 Received: from mail-da0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:33724 "EHLO mail-da0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752233Ab2J3CZK (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Oct 2012 22:25:10 -0400 Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:26:05 -0700 From: Greg KH To: George Zhang Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, pv-drivers@vmware.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/12] VMCI: event handling implementation. Message-ID: <20121030022605.GG1920@kroah.com> References: <20121030005923.17788.21797.stgit@promb-2n-dhcp175.eng.vmware.com> <20121030010420.17788.59187.stgit@promb-2n-dhcp175.eng.vmware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121030010420.17788.59187.stgit@promb-2n-dhcp175.eng.vmware.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 06:04:27PM -0700, George Zhang wrote: > +static void event_signal_destroy(struct kref *kref) > +{ > + struct vmci_subscription *entry = > + container_of(kref, struct vmci_subscription, kref); > + > + complete(&entry->done); > +} Didn't you just leak memory here? What frees the structure up? thanks, greg k-h