All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nico Schottelius <nico-kernel20120920@schottelius.org>
To: Nico Schottelius <nico-kernel20120920@schottelius.org>,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@kernel.org>,
	jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Out of memory on 3.5 kernels
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:35:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121030103535.GA10526@schottelius.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121005175139.GC831@schottelius.org>

Good morning,

update: this problem still exists on 3.6.2-1-ARCH and it got worse:

I reformatted the external disk to use xfs, but as the my
root filesystem is still jfs, it still appears:

 Active / Total Objects (% used)    : 642732 / 692268 (92.8%)
 Active / Total Slabs (% used)      : 24801 / 24801 (100.0%)
 Active / Total Caches (% used)     : 79 / 111 (71.2%)
 Active / Total Size (% used)       : 603522.30K / 622612.05K (96.9%)
 Minimum / Average / Maximum Object : 0.01K / 0.90K / 15.25K

  OBJS ACTIVE  USE OBJ SIZE  SLABS OBJ/SLAB CACHE SIZE NAME                   
475548 467649  98%    1.21K  18722       26    599104K jfs_ip
 25670  19143  74%    0.05K    302       85      1208K shared_policy_node
 24612  16861  68%    0.19K   1172       21      4688K dentry
 24426  19524  79%    0.17K   1062       23      4248K vm_area_struct
 21636  21180  97%    0.11K    601       36      2404K sysfs_dir_cache
 12352   9812  79%    0.06K    193       64       772K kmalloc-64
 11684   9145  78%    0.09K    254       46      1016K anon_vma
  9855   8734  88%    0.58K    365       27      5840K inode_cache
  9728   9281  95%    0.01K     19      512        76K kmalloc-8
  8932   4411  49%    0.55K    319       28      5104K radix_tree_node
  6336   5760  90%    0.25K    198       32      1584K kmalloc-256
  5632   5632 100%    0.02K     22      256        88K kmalloc-16
  4998   2627  52%    0.09K    119       42       476K kmalloc-96
  4998   3893  77%    0.04K     49      102       196K Acpi-Namespace
  4736   3887  82%    0.03K     37      128       148K kmalloc-32
  4144   4144 100%    0.07K     74       56       296K Acpi-ParseExt
  3740   3740 100%    0.02K     22      170        88K numa_policy
  3486   3023  86%    0.19K    166       21       664K kmalloc-192
  3200   2047  63%    0.12K    100       32       400K kmalloc-128
  2304   2074  90%    0.50K     72       32      1152K kmalloc-512
  2136   2019  94%    0.64K     89       24      1424K proc_inode_cache
  2080   2080 100%    0.12K     65       32       260K jfs_mp
  2024   1890  93%    0.70K     88       23      1408K shmem_inode_cache
  1632   1556  95%    1.00K     51       32      1632K kmalloc-1024


I am wondering if anyone is feeling responsible for this bug or if the mid-term
solution is to move away from jfs?

Cheers,

Nico

-- 
PGP key: 7ED9 F7D3 6B10 81D7 0EC5  5C09 D7DC C8E4 3187 7DF0

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-30 22:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-20 13:52 Out of memory on 3.5 kernels Arend van Spriel
2012-09-21 19:49 ` Nico Schottelius
2012-09-21 21:02   ` Fwd: " Arend van Spriel
2012-09-24 22:43   ` David Rientjes
2012-09-25 15:07     ` Dave Kleikamp
2012-09-26  6:03       ` Nico Schottelius
2012-09-26  6:06     ` Nico Schottelius
2012-09-26  8:57       ` Nico Schottelius
2012-09-27  5:52         ` Nico Schottelius
2012-10-03 21:23           ` Nico Schottelius
2012-10-05 15:48             ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2012-10-05 17:51               ` Nico Schottelius
2012-10-30 10:35                 ` Nico Schottelius [this message]
2012-11-01 18:04                   ` [Jfs-discussion] " Tino Reichardt
2012-11-21 22:37                   ` Dave Kleikamp
2012-11-27 15:56                     ` [Jfs-discussion] " Dave Kleikamp
2012-11-27 16:11                       ` Nico Schottelius
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-09-20  6:02 Nico Schottelius
2012-09-20  6:54 ` David Rientjes
2012-09-20  7:32   ` Nico Schottelius
2012-09-20  7:44     ` Arend van Spriel
2012-09-20  8:21       ` Nico Schottelius
2012-09-20 12:12       ` Nico Schottelius

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121030103535.GA10526@schottelius.org \
    --to=nico-kernel20120920@schottelius.org \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=arend@broadcom.com \
    --cc=jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=shaggy@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.