From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/8] bridge: implement BPDU blocking Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 13:57:48 -0700 Message-ID: <20121031135748.60a89df3@s6510.linuxnetplumber.net> References: <20121030005731.843020405@vyatta.com> <20121030005835.462418417@vyatta.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Cong Wang Return-path: Received: from mail.vyatta.com ([76.74.103.46]:36741 "EHLO mail.vyatta.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760559Ab2JaU55 (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Oct 2012 16:57:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 02:38:46 +0000 (UTC) Cong Wang wrote: > On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 at 00:57 GMT, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > --- a/net/bridge/br_stp_bpdu.c 2012-10-29 17:07:08.005982838 -0700 > > +++ b/net/bridge/br_stp_bpdu.c 2012-10-29 17:31:14.327457434 -0700 > > @@ -170,6 +170,13 @@ void br_stp_rcv(const struct stp_proto * > > if (!ether_addr_equal(dest, br->group_addr)) > > goto out; > > > > + if (p->flags & BR_BPDU_GUARD) { > > + br_notice(br, "BPDU received on blocked port %u(%s)\n", > > + (unsigned int) p->port_no, p->dev->name); > > net_ratelimit() ? > Not necessary since this causes port of bridge to become disabled; which blocks all further packets (including STP) until manually reset.