From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 19:44:20 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] RPC.h and busybox In-Reply-To: <20121031145249.GJ30343@sapphire.tkos.co.il> References: <20121031114118.GF30343@sapphire.tkos.co.il> <20121031153101.41b26063@skate> <20121031145249.GJ30343@sapphire.tkos.co.il> Message-ID: <20121031194420.1e066252@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Baruch Siach, On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 16:52:49 +0200, Baruch Siach wrote: > > I intend to adjust a few things and update it, before resending it. > > Maybe before the Buildroot meeting this week-end, maybe after. > > Well, this only solves the problem for internal toolchains, isn't it? No, the intention is to solve the problem for glibc/eglibc toolchains. The existing support for glibc/eglibc toolchains (both the external toolchain support and the crosstool-ng backend) assume that if the C library is glibc or eglibc, then the C library *always* has RPC support. Starting (e)glibc 2.14 this is no longer correct, so my patch set takes this into account at the Buildroot level. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com