From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
Cc: NETDEV <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] net: netlink -- Allow netlink_dump to return error code if protocol handler is missed
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 23:16:17 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121103191617.GD32458@moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121103163958.GB6055@moon>
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 08:39:58PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 08:17:50PM +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> > > static int inet_diag_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
> > > Index: linux-2.6.git/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux-2.6.git.orig/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
> > > +++ linux-2.6.git/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
> > > @@ -1740,6 +1740,10 @@ static int netlink_dump(struct sock *sk)
> > > else
> > > __netlink_sendskb(sk, skb);
> > > return 0;
> > > + } else if (len < 0) {
> > > + err = len;
> > > + nlk->cb = NULL;
> > > + goto errout_skb;
> >
> > When family-level handler is absent and sock_diag returns error this error
> > gets propagated back to user without this fix. Why do we need it in case
> > we return error from protocol-level handler?
>
> Because as far as I can say the family-level handler already has such error
> returning code in __sock_diag_rcv_msg. Or you mean something else?
OK, it seems I got what you mean, cooking/testing new patch.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-03 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-02 17:35 [RFC] net: netlink -- Allow netlink_dump to return error code if protocol handler is missed Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-11-03 16:17 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2012-11-03 16:39 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-11-03 19:16 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121103191617.GD32458@moon \
--to=gorcunov@openvz.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xemul@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.