From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Cc: rob@landley.net, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, arjan@linux.intel.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
andre.przywara@amd.com, rjw@sisk.pl,
paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cl@linux.com, pjt@google.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] sched: add sched_policy and it's sysfs interface
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 14:48:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121106134831.GA969@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1352207399-29497-2-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com>
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 09:09:57PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> This patch add the power aware scheduler knob into sysfs:
>
> $cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/sched_policy/available_sched_policy
> performance powersaving
>
> $cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/sched_policy/current_sched_policy
> powersaving
>
> The using sched policy is 'powersaving'. User can change the policy
> by commend 'echo':
> echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/current_sched_policy
>
> Power aware scheduling will has different behavior according to
> different policy:
>
> performance: the current scheduling behaviour, try to spread tasks
> on more CPU sockets or cores.
> powersaving: will shrink tasks into sched group until the group's
> nr_running is up to group_weight.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
> ---
> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu | 21 +++++++
> drivers/base/cpu.c | 2 +
> include/linux/cpu.h | 2 +
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> kernel/sched/sched.h | 5 ++
> 5 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
> index 6943133..1909d3e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
> @@ -53,6 +53,27 @@ Description: Dynamic addition and removal of CPU's. This is not hotplug
> the system. Information writtento the file to remove CPU's
> is architecture specific.
>
> +What: /sys/devices/system/cpu/sched_policy/current_sched_policy
> + /sys/devices/system/cpu/sched_policy/available_sched_policy
> +Date: Oct 2012
> +Contact: Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> +Description: CFS scheduler policy showing and setting interface.
> +
> + available_sched_policy shows there are 2 kinds of policy now:
> + performance and powersaving.
> + current_sched_policy shows current scheduler policy. And user
> + can change the policy by writing it.
> +
> + Policy decides that CFS scheduler how to distribute tasks onto
> + which CPU unit when tasks number less than LCPU number in system
> +
> + performance: try to spread tasks onto more CPU sockets,
> + more CPU cores.
> +
> + powersaving: try to shrink tasks onto same core or same CPU
> + until running task number beyond the LCPU number in the core
> + or socket.
> +
> What: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu#/node
> Date: October 2009
> Contact: Linux memory management mailing list <linux-mm@kvack.org>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/cpu.c b/drivers/base/cpu.c
> index 6345294..5f6a573 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/cpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/cpu.c
> @@ -330,4 +330,6 @@ void __init cpu_dev_init(void)
> panic("Failed to register CPU subsystem");
>
> cpu_dev_register_generic();
> +
> + create_sysfs_sched_policy_group(cpu_subsys.dev_root);
Are you sure you didn't just race with userspace, creating the sysfs
files after the device was created and announced to userspace?
If so, you need to fix this :)
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-06 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-06 13:09 [RFC PATCH 0/3] power aware scheduling Alex Shi
2012-11-06 13:09 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] sched: add sched_policy and it's sysfs interface Alex Shi
2012-11-06 13:48 ` Greg KH [this message]
2012-11-07 12:27 ` Alex Shi
2012-11-07 14:41 ` Greg KH
2012-11-08 14:40 ` Alex Shi
2012-11-06 15:20 ` Luming Yu
2012-11-07 13:03 ` Alex Shi
2012-11-06 13:09 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] sched: power aware load balance, Alex Shi
2012-11-06 19:51 ` Andrew Morton
2012-11-07 12:42 ` Alex Shi
2012-11-07 4:37 ` Preeti Murthy
2012-11-07 13:27 ` Alex Shi
2012-11-11 18:49 ` Preeti Murthy
2012-11-12 3:05 ` Alex Shi
2012-11-06 13:09 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] sched: add power aware scheduling in fork/exec/wake Alex Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121106134831.GA969@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@amd.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.