From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] USB: add arrow key support to usb_kbd
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 14:18:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201211071418.28173.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50999892.3090702@wwwdotorg.org>
Dear Stephen Warren,
> On 11/06/2012 03:56 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Dear Simon Glass,
> >
> >> Hi Marek,
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> >>> Dear Allen Martin,
> >>>
> >>>> Check for scancodes for arrow keys and map them to ^F/^B, ^N/^P.
> >>>> Control characters are used instead of ANSI sequence because the
> >>>> queueing code in usb_kbd doesn't handle the data increase when one
> >>>> keypress generates 3 keycodes. The real fix is to convert this driver
> >>>> to use the input subsystem and queue
> >>>
> >>> If it's the real fix, then why not go for the real fix right away? :-(
> >>
> >> Because it's a fair chunk of work
> >
> > Let's either do it properly or not at all ... if I let you do these semi-
> > complete fixes, we'll end up with a stinking pile of crap like windows
> > ...
>
> Marek, I find this attitude a little ridiculous. If everything was fixed
> completely the first time around, there would be no work left to do;
> we'd just stop developing U-Boot. Equally, if this small addition to the
> USB keyboard code is so bad it can't be allowed since the whole driver
> must be re-written instead, why was the existing code allowed into
> U-Boot in the first place?
Because evil b*tch (=me) wasn't around in the first place ;-) Anyway ... I'll
apply it (not because of your whining and stuff ... but because it's
beneficial). Though, I'd be really glad if you invested time to rework the
driver. Otherwise, it'll be me who'll end up doing the work and I'd prefer to
delegate it to someone who brough the issue up sooner ;-)
> Incremental small patches are good; they allow small simple things to be
> implemented without causing massive disruption. That's great for
> locating any regressions.
>
> Is there anything actually technically wrong with this specific patch? I
> would say no; it's very simple, non-invasive, low-risk, doesn't appear
> to introduce any long-term maintenance burden, doesn't completely
> prevent or remotely hinder reworking the USB keyboard support in the
> future, etc.
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-07 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-06 21:26 [U-Boot] [PATCH] USB: add arrow key support to usb_kbd Allen Martin
2012-11-06 21:51 ` Stephen Warren
2012-11-06 22:49 ` Marek Vasut
2012-11-06 22:51 ` Simon Glass
2012-11-06 22:56 ` Marek Vasut
2012-11-06 23:06 ` Allen Martin
2012-11-07 13:15 ` Marek Vasut
2012-11-06 23:09 ` Stephen Warren
2012-11-07 13:18 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2012-11-07 19:02 ` Allen Martin
2012-11-08 1:19 ` Marek Vasut
2012-11-06 22:55 ` Allen Martin
2012-11-06 22:52 ` Simon Glass
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201211071418.28173.marex@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.