From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 8
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 23:52:52 +0100
Message-ID: <20121108235252.10aa2d4a@gaivota.chehab>
References: <20121108154949.552d05430f0c46ed2e188667@canb.auug.org.au>
	<CA+icZUVSZSXr+DiJmqfxjGmGn+DojXRH8MkdLjbgapGdi6gXdg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48824 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1757167Ab2KHWxL (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 8 Nov 2012 17:53:11 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CA+icZUVSZSXr+DiJmqfxjGmGn+DojXRH8MkdLjbgapGdi6gXdg@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Em Thu, 8 Nov 2012 10:10:29 +0100
Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> escreveu:

> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 5:49 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20121107:
> >
> [...]
> >
> > The v4l-dvb tree still has its build failure so I used the version from
> > next-20121026.
> >
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I am just wondering why this v4l-dvb issues are still present...
> ...since 26-Oct-2012...
> ...Maintainer on holidays :-)?

I wish I had it ;)

> I know most Linux kernel people are visting Barcelona this week.

Well, not visiting. Working from here... and the network at the hotel sucks. 

Regards,
Mauro