From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: sameo@linux.intel.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com,
broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] mfd: Only unregister platform devices allocated by the mfd core
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 16:15:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121109161528.GA674@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
mfd_remove_devices would iterate over all devices sharing a parent with
an mfd device regardless of whether they were allocated by the mfd core
or not. This especially caused problems when the device structure was
not contained within a platform_device, because to_platform_device is
used on each device pointer.
This patch defines a device_type for mfd devices and checks this is
present from mfd_remove_devices_fn before processing the device.
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
---
drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
index f8b7771..7604f4e 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
@@ -21,6 +21,10 @@
#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
+static struct device_type mfd_dev_type = {
+ .name = "mfd_device",
+};
+
int mfd_cell_enable(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
const struct mfd_cell *cell = mfd_get_cell(pdev);
@@ -91,6 +95,7 @@ static int mfd_add_device(struct device *parent, int id,
goto fail_device;
pdev->dev.parent = parent;
+ pdev->dev.type = &mfd_dev_type;
if (parent->of_node && cell->of_compatible) {
for_each_child_of_node(parent->of_node, np) {
@@ -204,10 +209,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(mfd_add_devices);
static int mfd_remove_devices_fn(struct device *dev, void *c)
{
- struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
- const struct mfd_cell *cell = mfd_get_cell(pdev);
+ struct platform_device *pdev;
+ const struct mfd_cell *cell;
atomic_t **usage_count = c;
+ if (dev->type != &mfd_dev_type)
+ return 0;
+
+ pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
+ cell = mfd_get_cell(pdev);
+
/* find the base address of usage_count pointers (for freeing) */
if (!*usage_count || (cell->usage_count < *usage_count))
*usage_count = cell->usage_count;
--
1.7.2.5
next reply other threads:[~2012-11-09 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-09 16:15 Charles Keepax [this message]
2012-11-09 16:40 ` [PATCH v2] mfd: Only unregister platform devices allocated by the mfd core Mark Brown
2012-11-19 0:20 ` Samuel Ortiz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121109161528.GA674@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--to=ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.