From: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Florian Pritz <bluewind@xinu.at>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Alex Elder <elder@kernel.org>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: NFS stalls when writing - linux 3.6.x
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 11:20:14 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121109172014.GT9783@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121109163658.GE6171@fieldses.org>
Hey Bruce & Florian,
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 11:36:58AM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 05:04:35PM +0100, Florian Pritz wrote:
> > On 07.11.2012 20:07, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > >> Sadly I don't know when this started happening.
> > >
> > > It would be helpful to know that--especially if you find an easy way to
> > > reproduce this, it would be worth booting to older kernels and seeing if
> > > you can figure when the problem started.
> >
> > I'll try that unless the sysrq output helps.
> >
> > >> top on the server now shows lots of nfsd threads in D state.
> > >
> > > Next time you find in that state, could you try
> > >
> > > echo t >/proc/sysrq-trigger
> > >
> > > on the server? That will dump a bunch of data to the logs which we
> > > might be able to use.
> >
> > Data should be attached if the ML allows it. Hope it helps. sysrq output
> > is after line 883.
>
> The nfsd threads are all stuck in _vfs_lock_force_lsn in xfs_file_fsync;
> for example:
>
> > [99390.866452] nfsd D ffff880075723060 0 1342 2 0x00000000
> > [99390.866455] ffff88007988d8b0 0000000000000046 ffff880075723060 ffff88007988dfd8
> > [99390.866460] ffff88007988dfd8 ffff88007988dfd8 ffff88007bbcd0a0 ffff880075723060
> > [99390.866464] ffff88007553b998 ffff88007553b980 ffff88005cd2d0c0 0000000000000001
> > [99390.866468] Call Trace:
> > [99390.866484] [<ffffffffa0af521e>] ? xlog_cil_force_lsn+0xce/0x160 [xfs]
> > [99390.866488] [<ffffffff81491b79>] schedule+0x29/0x70
> > [99390.866504] [<ffffffffa0af3a17>] _xfs_log_force_lsn+0x287/0x2d0 [xfs]
> > [99390.866508] [<ffffffff8108bbd0>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x2f0/0x2f0
> > [99390.866519] [<ffffffffa0a9ecff>] xfs_file_fsync+0x1bf/0x230 [xfs]
> > [99390.866524] [<ffffffff811ae21d>] generic_write_sync+0x4d/0x60
> > [99390.866536] [<ffffffffa0a9fbcf>] xfs_file_aio_write+0x12f/0x160 [xfs]
> > [99390.866547] [<ffffffffa0a9faa0>] ? xfs_file_buffered_aio_write+0x1f0/0x1f0 [xfs]
> > [99390.866552] [<ffffffff8117fb73>] do_sync_readv_writev+0xa3/0xe0
> > [99390.866557] [<ffffffff8117fe54>] do_readv_writev+0xd4/0x1e0
> > [99390.866565] [<ffffffffa0ba3170>] ? _fh_update.isra.9.part.10+0x60/0x60 [nfsd]
> > [99390.866572] [<ffffffffa0ba3170>] ? _fh_update.isra.9.part.10+0x60/0x60 [nfsd]
> > [99390.866576] [<ffffffff811f64cf>] ? exportfs_decode_fh+0xaf/0x310
> > [99390.866581] [<ffffffff8117ff95>] vfs_writev+0x35/0x60
> > [99390.866588] [<ffffffffa0ba44fb>] nfsd_vfs_write.isra.11+0xeb/0x300 [nfsd]
> > [99390.866598] [<ffffffffa0bbb262>] ? find_confirmed_client+0xb2/0x100 [nfsd]
> > [99390.866607] [<ffffffffa0bbc1ba>] ? nfsd4_lookup_stateid+0xea/0x120 [nfsd]
> > [99390.866615] [<ffffffffa0ba6b22>] nfsd_write+0xa2/0x110 [nfsd]
> > [99390.866623] [<ffffffffa0bb1463>] nfsd4_write+0xe3/0x110 [nfsd]
> > [99390.866632] [<ffffffffa0bb20bc>] nfsd4_proc_compound+0x2fc/0x650 [nfsd]
> > [99390.866639] [<ffffffffa0ba0b3e>] nfsd_dispatch+0xbe/0x1c0 [nfsd]
> > [99390.866651] [<ffffffffa027020e>] svc_process+0x48e/0x790 [sunrpc]
> > [99390.866658] [<ffffffffa0ba0115>] nfsd+0xb5/0x1a0 [nfsd]
> > [99390.866664] [<ffffffffa0ba0060>] ? nfsd_get_default_max_blksize+0x60/0x60 [nfsd]
> > [99390.866668] [<ffffffff81079a03>] kthread+0x93/0xa0
> > [99390.866673] [<ffffffff8149b144>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> > [99390.866678] [<ffffffff81079970>] ? kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x70/0x70
> > [99390.866682] [<ffffffff8149b140>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
>
> Maybe xfs folks would have an idea? (More context:
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.nfs/53123/focus=53180
> )
I took a brief look but there were no slam dunks. This seems like it might be
a candidate:
8375f922 - xfs: re-enable xfsaild idle mode and fix associated races
The sysrq-trigger information would definately be helpful. Meanwhile I'll see
if I can reproduce the issue.
Thanks,
Ben
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Alex Elder <elder@kernel.org>,
Florian Pritz <bluewind@xinu.at>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: NFS stalls when writing - linux 3.6.x
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 11:20:14 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121109172014.GT9783@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121109163658.GE6171@fieldses.org>
Hey Bruce & Florian,
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 11:36:58AM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 05:04:35PM +0100, Florian Pritz wrote:
> > On 07.11.2012 20:07, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > >> Sadly I don't know when this started happening.
> > >
> > > It would be helpful to know that--especially if you find an easy way to
> > > reproduce this, it would be worth booting to older kernels and seeing if
> > > you can figure when the problem started.
> >
> > I'll try that unless the sysrq output helps.
> >
> > >> top on the server now shows lots of nfsd threads in D state.
> > >
> > > Next time you find in that state, could you try
> > >
> > > echo t >/proc/sysrq-trigger
> > >
> > > on the server? That will dump a bunch of data to the logs which we
> > > might be able to use.
> >
> > Data should be attached if the ML allows it. Hope it helps. sysrq output
> > is after line 883.
>
> The nfsd threads are all stuck in _vfs_lock_force_lsn in xfs_file_fsync;
> for example:
>
> > [99390.866452] nfsd D ffff880075723060 0 1342 2 0x00000000
> > [99390.866455] ffff88007988d8b0 0000000000000046 ffff880075723060 ffff88007988dfd8
> > [99390.866460] ffff88007988dfd8 ffff88007988dfd8 ffff88007bbcd0a0 ffff880075723060
> > [99390.866464] ffff88007553b998 ffff88007553b980 ffff88005cd2d0c0 0000000000000001
> > [99390.866468] Call Trace:
> > [99390.866484] [<ffffffffa0af521e>] ? xlog_cil_force_lsn+0xce/0x160 [xfs]
> > [99390.866488] [<ffffffff81491b79>] schedule+0x29/0x70
> > [99390.866504] [<ffffffffa0af3a17>] _xfs_log_force_lsn+0x287/0x2d0 [xfs]
> > [99390.866508] [<ffffffff8108bbd0>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x2f0/0x2f0
> > [99390.866519] [<ffffffffa0a9ecff>] xfs_file_fsync+0x1bf/0x230 [xfs]
> > [99390.866524] [<ffffffff811ae21d>] generic_write_sync+0x4d/0x60
> > [99390.866536] [<ffffffffa0a9fbcf>] xfs_file_aio_write+0x12f/0x160 [xfs]
> > [99390.866547] [<ffffffffa0a9faa0>] ? xfs_file_buffered_aio_write+0x1f0/0x1f0 [xfs]
> > [99390.866552] [<ffffffff8117fb73>] do_sync_readv_writev+0xa3/0xe0
> > [99390.866557] [<ffffffff8117fe54>] do_readv_writev+0xd4/0x1e0
> > [99390.866565] [<ffffffffa0ba3170>] ? _fh_update.isra.9.part.10+0x60/0x60 [nfsd]
> > [99390.866572] [<ffffffffa0ba3170>] ? _fh_update.isra.9.part.10+0x60/0x60 [nfsd]
> > [99390.866576] [<ffffffff811f64cf>] ? exportfs_decode_fh+0xaf/0x310
> > [99390.866581] [<ffffffff8117ff95>] vfs_writev+0x35/0x60
> > [99390.866588] [<ffffffffa0ba44fb>] nfsd_vfs_write.isra.11+0xeb/0x300 [nfsd]
> > [99390.866598] [<ffffffffa0bbb262>] ? find_confirmed_client+0xb2/0x100 [nfsd]
> > [99390.866607] [<ffffffffa0bbc1ba>] ? nfsd4_lookup_stateid+0xea/0x120 [nfsd]
> > [99390.866615] [<ffffffffa0ba6b22>] nfsd_write+0xa2/0x110 [nfsd]
> > [99390.866623] [<ffffffffa0bb1463>] nfsd4_write+0xe3/0x110 [nfsd]
> > [99390.866632] [<ffffffffa0bb20bc>] nfsd4_proc_compound+0x2fc/0x650 [nfsd]
> > [99390.866639] [<ffffffffa0ba0b3e>] nfsd_dispatch+0xbe/0x1c0 [nfsd]
> > [99390.866651] [<ffffffffa027020e>] svc_process+0x48e/0x790 [sunrpc]
> > [99390.866658] [<ffffffffa0ba0115>] nfsd+0xb5/0x1a0 [nfsd]
> > [99390.866664] [<ffffffffa0ba0060>] ? nfsd_get_default_max_blksize+0x60/0x60 [nfsd]
> > [99390.866668] [<ffffffff81079a03>] kthread+0x93/0xa0
> > [99390.866673] [<ffffffff8149b144>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> > [99390.866678] [<ffffffff81079970>] ? kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x70/0x70
> > [99390.866682] [<ffffffff8149b140>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
>
> Maybe xfs folks would have an idea? (More context:
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.nfs/53123/focus=53180
> )
I took a brief look but there were no slam dunks. This seems like it might be
a candidate:
8375f922 - xfs: re-enable xfsaild idle mode and fix associated races
The sysrq-trigger information would definately be helpful. Meanwhile I'll see
if I can reproduce the issue.
Thanks,
Ben
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-09 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-03 19:29 NFS stalls when writing - linux 3.6.x Florian Pritz
2012-11-07 19:07 ` J. Bruce Fields
[not found] ` <509D2993.4050604@xinu.at>
2012-11-09 16:36 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-11-09 16:36 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-11-09 17:20 ` Ben Myers [this message]
2012-11-09 17:20 ` Ben Myers
2012-11-09 17:25 ` Florian Pritz
2012-11-09 17:25 ` Florian Pritz
2012-11-09 17:53 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-11-09 17:53 ` Mark Tinguely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121109172014.GT9783@sgi.com \
--to=bpm@sgi.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=bluewind@xinu.at \
--cc=elder@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.