From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Update load-detect failure
 paths for modeset-rework
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:46:32 +0100
Message-ID: <20121110134632.GG5854@phenom.ffwll.local>
References: <1352154308-12441-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
	<1352154308-12441-2-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mail-ea0-f177.google.com (mail-ea0-f177.google.com
	[209.85.215.177])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C3509E92B
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Sat, 10 Nov 2012 05:45:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ea0-f177.google.com with SMTP id n13so1821271eaa.36
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Sat, 10 Nov 2012 05:45:18 -0800 (PST)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1352154308-12441-2-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 10:25:08PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> After the rework, intel_set_mode() became a little better behaved in
> restoring the current mode if we failed to apply the requested modeline.
> However, the failure path for load-detect would clobber the existing
> state, leading to an oops during BIOS takeover on older machines.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Both patches applied to dinq.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch