From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] arch_gettimeoffset and ARM timer rework Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 14:17:58 +0000 Message-ID: <201211121417.58380.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1352408516-21988-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:50437 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753111Ab2KLOSM (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2012 09:18:12 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1352408516-21988-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Warren Cc: Russell King , Olof Johansson , John Stultz , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Warren On Thursday 08 November 2012, Stephen Warren wrote: > It would probably be easiest to merge this whole series through the > arm-soc tree. Anything else would require some co-ordination. Fine with me. The patches all look good to me, so let's give people a little more time to weigh in with Acks and possible objections. In particular, I hope Russell can comment if he has an opionion on these. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 14:17:58 +0000 Subject: [RFC PATCH 00/11] arch_gettimeoffset and ARM timer rework In-Reply-To: <1352408516-21988-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1352408516-21988-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> Message-ID: <201211121417.58380.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thursday 08 November 2012, Stephen Warren wrote: > It would probably be easiest to merge this whole series through the > arm-soc tree. Anything else would require some co-ordination. Fine with me. The patches all look good to me, so let's give people a little more time to weigh in with Acks and possible objections. In particular, I hope Russell can comment if he has an opionion on these. Arnd