[PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[Chuansheng Liu]

The return value of wait_for_completion_timeout() is always
>= 0 with unsigned int type.

So the condition "ret < 0" or "ret >= 0" is pointless.

Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c |   14 --------------
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c
index 02c3115..8b2ffcf 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c
@@ -435,13 +435,6 @@ static int read_i2c(struct nmk_i2c_dev *dev, u16 flags)
 	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(
 		&dev->xfer_complete, dev->adap.timeout);
 
-	if (timeout < 0) {
-		dev_err(&dev->adev->dev,
-			"wait_for_completion_timeout "
-			"returned %d waiting for event\n", timeout);
-		status = timeout;
-	}
-
 	if (timeout == 0) {
 		/* Controller timed out */
 		dev_err(&dev->adev->dev, "read from slave 0x%x timed out\n",
@@ -523,13 +516,6 @@ static int write_i2c(struct nmk_i2c_dev *dev, u16 flags)
 	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(
 		&dev->xfer_complete, dev->adap.timeout);
 
-	if (timeout < 0) {
-		dev_err(&dev->adev->dev,
-			"wait_for_completion_timeout "
-			"returned %d waiting for event\n", timeout);
-		status = timeout;
-	}
-
 	if (timeout == 0) {
 		/* Controller timed out */
 		dev_err(&dev->adev->dev, "write to slave 0x%x timed out\n",
-- 
1.7.0.4

[PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[Chuansheng Liu]

The return value of wait_for_completion_timeout() is always
>= 0 with unsigned int type.

So the condition "ret < 0" or "ret >= 0" is pointless.

Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c |   14 --------------
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c
index 02c3115..8b2ffcf 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c
@@ -435,13 +435,6 @@ static int read_i2c(struct nmk_i2c_dev *dev, u16 flags)
 	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(
 		&dev->xfer_complete, dev->adap.timeout);
 
-	if (timeout < 0) {
-		dev_err(&dev->adev->dev,
-			"wait_for_completion_timeout "
-			"returned %d waiting for event\n", timeout);
-		status = timeout;
-	}
-
 	if (timeout == 0) {
 		/* Controller timed out */
 		dev_err(&dev->adev->dev, "read from slave 0x%x timed out\n",
@@ -523,13 +516,6 @@ static int write_i2c(struct nmk_i2c_dev *dev, u16 flags)
 	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(
 		&dev->xfer_complete, dev->adap.timeout);
 
-	if (timeout < 0) {
-		dev_err(&dev->adev->dev,
-			"wait_for_completion_timeout "
-			"returned %d waiting for event\n", timeout);
-		status = timeout;
-	}
-
 	if (timeout == 0) {
 		/* Controller timed out */
 		dev_err(&dev->adev->dev, "write to slave 0x%x timed out\n",
-- 
1.7.0.4

[PATCH 2/7] OMAPDSS: DISPC: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[Chuansheng Liu]

The return value of wait_for_completion_timeout() is always
>= 0 with unsigned int type.

So the condition "ret < 0" or "ret >= 0" is pointless.

Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c |    3 ---
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c
index b43477a..9858869 100644
--- a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c
+++ b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c
@@ -3893,9 +3893,6 @@ int omap_dispc_wait_for_irq_timeout(u32 irqmask, unsigned long timeout)
 	if (timeout == 0)
 		return -ETIMEDOUT;
 
-	if (timeout == -ERESTARTSYS)
-		return -ERESTARTSYS;
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
1.7.0.4

Re: [PATCH 2/7] OMAPDSS: DISPC: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[Tomi Valkeinen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 896 bytes --]

On 2012-11-06 19:21, Chuansheng Liu wrote:
> 
> The return value of wait_for_completion_timeout() is always
>> = 0 with unsigned int type.
> 
> So the condition "ret < 0" or "ret >= 0" is pointless.
> 
> Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c |    3 ---
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c
> index b43477a..9858869 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c
> @@ -3893,9 +3893,6 @@ int omap_dispc_wait_for_irq_timeout(u32 irqmask, unsigned long timeout)
>  	if (timeout == 0)
>  		return -ETIMEDOUT;
>  
> -	if (timeout == -ERESTARTSYS)
> -		return -ERESTARTSYS;
> -
>  	return 0;
>  }

Thanks. I'll apply this to omapdss tree to avoid any conflicts.

 Tomi




[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 897 bytes --]

[PATCH 3/7] OMAPDSS: APPLY: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[Chuansheng Liu]

The return value of wait_for_completion_timeout() is always
>= 0 with unsigned int type.

So the condition "ret < 0" or "ret >= 0" is pointless.

Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/video/omap2/dss/apply.c |    2 --
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/apply.c b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/apply.c
index 19d66f4..ec42a6a 100644
--- a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/apply.c
+++ b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/apply.c
@@ -414,8 +414,6 @@ static void wait_pending_extra_info_updates(void)
 	r = wait_for_completion_timeout(&extra_updated_completion, t);
 	if (r == 0)
 		DSSWARN("timeout in wait_pending_extra_info_updates\n");
-	else if (r < 0)
-		DSSERR("wait_pending_extra_info_updates failed: %d\n", r);
 }
 
 int dss_mgr_wait_for_go(struct omap_overlay_manager *mgr)
-- 
1.7.0.4

Re: [PATCH 3/7] OMAPDSS: APPLY: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[Tomi Valkeinen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1040 bytes --]

On 2012-11-06 19:22, Chuansheng Liu wrote:
> 
> The return value of wait_for_completion_timeout() is always
>> = 0 with unsigned int type.
> 
> So the condition "ret < 0" or "ret >= 0" is pointless.
> 
> Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/video/omap2/dss/apply.c |    2 --
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/apply.c b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/apply.c
> index 19d66f4..ec42a6a 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/apply.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/apply.c
> @@ -414,8 +414,6 @@ static void wait_pending_extra_info_updates(void)
>  	r = wait_for_completion_timeout(&extra_updated_completion, t);
>  	if (r == 0)
>  		DSSWARN("timeout in wait_pending_extra_info_updates\n");
> -	else if (r < 0)
> -		DSSERR("wait_pending_extra_info_updates failed: %d\n", r);
>  }
>  
>  int dss_mgr_wait_for_go(struct omap_overlay_manager *mgr)

Thanks. I'll apply this to omapdss tree to avoid any conflicts.

 Tomi





[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 897 bytes --]

[PATCH 4/7] wlcore: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[Chuansheng Liu]

The return value of wait_for_completion_timeout() is always
>= 0 with unsigned int type.

So the condition "ret < 0" or "ret >= 0" is pointless.

Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/ps.c |    3 ---
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/ps.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/ps.c
index 4d1414a..ffcd843 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/ps.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/ps.c
@@ -151,9 +151,6 @@ int wl1271_ps_elp_wakeup(struct wl1271 *wl)
 			wl12xx_queue_recovery_work(wl);
 			ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
 			goto err;
-		} else if (ret < 0) {
-			wl1271_error("ELP wakeup completion error.");
-			goto err;
 		}
 	}
 
-- 
1.7.0.4

[PATCH 5/7] can: janz-ican3: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[Chuansheng Liu]

The return value of wait_for_completion_timeout() is always
>= 0 with unsigned int type.

So the condition "ret < 0" or "ret >= 0" is pointless.

Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/can/janz-ican3.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/janz-ican3.c b/drivers/net/can/janz-ican3.c
index 7edadee..c0bfb0a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/janz-ican3.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/janz-ican3.c
@@ -1692,7 +1692,7 @@ static int ican3_get_berr_counter(const struct net_device *ndev,
 		return ret;
 
 	ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&mod->buserror_comp, HZ);
-	if (ret <= 0) {
+	if (ret == 0) {
 		dev_info(mod->dev, "%s timed out\n", __func__);
 		return -ETIMEDOUT;
 	}
@@ -1718,7 +1718,7 @@ static ssize_t ican3_sysfs_show_term(struct device *dev,
 		return ret;
 
 	ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&mod->termination_comp, HZ);
-	if (ret <= 0) {
+	if (ret == 0) {
 		dev_info(mod->dev, "%s timed out\n", __func__);
 		return -ETIMEDOUT;
 	}
-- 
1.7.0.4

Re: [PATCH 5/7] can: janz-ican3: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[Marc Kleine-Budde]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 651 bytes --]

On 11/06/2012 06:31 PM, Chuansheng Liu wrote:
> 
> The return value of wait_for_completion_timeout() is always
>> = 0 with unsigned int type.
> 
> So the condition "ret < 0" or "ret >= 0" is pointless.
> 
> Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>

Thnx, applied to can-next. Please put linux-can@vger.kernel.org on Cc
next time.

regards, Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 259 bytes --]

[PATCH 6/7] mx3fb: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[Chuansheng Liu]

The return value of wait_for_completion_timeout() is always
>= 0 with unsigned int type.

So the condition "ret < 0" or "ret >= 0" is pointless.

Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/video/mx3fb.c |    7 +++----
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/mx3fb.c b/drivers/video/mx3fb.c
index ce1d452..88bf368 100644
--- a/drivers/video/mx3fb.c
+++ b/drivers/video/mx3fb.c
@@ -1110,12 +1110,11 @@ static int mx3fb_pan_display(struct fb_var_screeninfo *var,
 	enable_irq(mx3_fbi->idmac_channel->eof_irq);
 
 	ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&mx3_fbi->flip_cmpl, HZ / 10);
-	if (ret <= 0) {
+	if (ret == 0) {
 		mutex_unlock(&mx3_fbi->mutex);
-		dev_info(fbi->device, "Panning failed due to %s\n", ret < 0 ?
-			 "user interrupt" : "timeout");
+		dev_info(fbi->device, "Panning failed due to timeout\n");
 		disable_irq(mx3_fbi->idmac_channel->eof_irq);
-		return ret ? : -ETIMEDOUT;
+		return -ETIMEDOUT;
 	}
 
 	mx3_fbi->cur_ipu_buf = !mx3_fbi->cur_ipu_buf;
-- 
1.7.0.4

[PATCH 7/7] IB/srpt: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[Chuansheng Liu]

The return value of wait_for_completion_timeout() is always
>= 0 with unsigned int type.

So the condition "ret < 0" or "ret >= 0" is pointless.

Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c
index cf23c46..1879b47 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c
@@ -3527,7 +3527,7 @@ static void srpt_close_session(struct se_session *se_sess)
 	spin_unlock_irq(&sdev->spinlock);
 
 	res = wait_for_completion_timeout(&release_done, 60 * HZ);
-	WARN_ON(res <= 0);
+	WARN_ON(res == 0);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
1.7.0.4

Re: [PATCH 4/7] wlcore: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[Luciano Coelho]

On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 01:28 +0800, Chuansheng Liu wrote:
> The return value of wait_for_completion_timeout() is always
> >= 0 with unsigned int type.
> 
> So the condition "ret < 0" or "ret >= 0" is pointless.
> 
> Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
> ---

Applied and pushed via wl12xx.git.

Thank you!

--
Luca.

Re: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[Wolfram Sang]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2127 bytes --]

On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 01:18:37AM +0800, Chuansheng Liu wrote:
> 
> The return value of wait_for_completion_timeout() is always
> >= 0 with unsigned int type.
> 
> So the condition "ret < 0" or "ret >= 0" is pointless.
> 
> Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>

You forgot to add the i2c-list, so I nearly overlooked this patch.
Luckily I haven't, so applied to for-next, thanks! Did you use a script
to find all occurences? Would be nice to know. Also, please take care of
the subject line. "I2c" is misspelled.

@Linus: I am not pushing out today, so if you want to add acks or so...

Thanks,

   Wolfram

> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c |   14 --------------
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c
> index 02c3115..8b2ffcf 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c
> @@ -435,13 +435,6 @@ static int read_i2c(struct nmk_i2c_dev *dev, u16 flags)
>  	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(
>  		&dev->xfer_complete, dev->adap.timeout);
>  
> -	if (timeout < 0) {
> -		dev_err(&dev->adev->dev,
> -			"wait_for_completion_timeout "
> -			"returned %d waiting for event\n", timeout);
> -		status = timeout;
> -	}
> -
>  	if (timeout == 0) {
>  		/* Controller timed out */
>  		dev_err(&dev->adev->dev, "read from slave 0x%x timed out\n",
> @@ -523,13 +516,6 @@ static int write_i2c(struct nmk_i2c_dev *dev, u16 flags)
>  	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(
>  		&dev->xfer_complete, dev->adap.timeout);
>  
> -	if (timeout < 0) {
> -		dev_err(&dev->adev->dev,
> -			"wait_for_completion_timeout "
> -			"returned %d waiting for event\n", timeout);
> -		status = timeout;
> -	}
> -
>  	if (timeout == 0) {
>  		/* Controller timed out */
>  		dev_err(&dev->adev->dev, "write to slave 0x%x timed out\n",
> -- 
> 1.7.0.4
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

[PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[Wolfram Sang]

On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 01:18:37AM +0800, Chuansheng Liu wrote:
> 
> The return value of wait_for_completion_timeout() is always
> >= 0 with unsigned int type.
> 
> So the condition "ret < 0" or "ret >= 0" is pointless.
> 
> Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>

You forgot to add the i2c-list, so I nearly overlooked this patch.
Luckily I haven't, so applied to for-next, thanks! Did you use a script
to find all occurences? Would be nice to know. Also, please take care of
the subject line. "I2c" is misspelled.

@Linus: I am not pushing out today, so if you want to add acks or so...

Thanks,

   Wolfram

> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c |   14 --------------
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c
> index 02c3115..8b2ffcf 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c
> @@ -435,13 +435,6 @@ static int read_i2c(struct nmk_i2c_dev *dev, u16 flags)
>  	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(
>  		&dev->xfer_complete, dev->adap.timeout);
>  
> -	if (timeout < 0) {
> -		dev_err(&dev->adev->dev,
> -			"wait_for_completion_timeout "
> -			"returned %d waiting for event\n", timeout);
> -		status = timeout;
> -	}
> -
>  	if (timeout == 0) {
>  		/* Controller timed out */
>  		dev_err(&dev->adev->dev, "read from slave 0x%x timed out\n",
> @@ -523,13 +516,6 @@ static int write_i2c(struct nmk_i2c_dev *dev, u16 flags)
>  	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(
>  		&dev->xfer_complete, dev->adap.timeout);
>  
> -	if (timeout < 0) {
> -		dev_err(&dev->adev->dev,
> -			"wait_for_completion_timeout "
> -			"returned %d waiting for event\n", timeout);
> -		status = timeout;
> -	}
> -
>  	if (timeout == 0) {
>  		/* Controller timed out */
>  		dev_err(&dev->adev->dev, "write to slave 0x%x timed out\n",
> -- 
> 1.7.0.4
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20121112/b7c7ac45/attachment.sig>

RE: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[Liu, Chuansheng]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wolfram Sang [mailto:w.sang@pengutronix.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 1:27 AM
> To: Liu, Chuansheng
> Cc: linus.walleij@linaro.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of
> wait_for_completion_timeout
> 
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 01:18:37AM +0800, Chuansheng Liu wrote:
> >
> > The return value of wait_for_completion_timeout() is always
> > >= 0 with unsigned int type.
> >
> > So the condition "ret < 0" or "ret >= 0" is pointless.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
> 
> You forgot to add the i2c-list, so I nearly overlooked this patch.
> Luckily I haven't, so applied to for-next, thanks! Did you use a script
> to find all occurences? Would be nice to know. Also, please take care of
> the subject line. "I2c" is misspelled.
Thanks your pointing out. I just manually reviewed the code when found this point.
Would like to try some auto-script but failed:)

[PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[Liu, Chuansheng]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wolfram Sang [mailto:w.sang at pengutronix.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 1:27 AM
> To: Liu, Chuansheng
> Cc: linus.walleij at linaro.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org;
> linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; linux-i2c at vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of
> wait_for_completion_timeout
> 
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 01:18:37AM +0800, Chuansheng Liu wrote:
> >
> > The return value of wait_for_completion_timeout() is always
> > >= 0 with unsigned int type.
> >
> > So the condition "ret < 0" or "ret >= 0" is pointless.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
> 
> You forgot to add the i2c-list, so I nearly overlooked this patch.
> Luckily I haven't, so applied to for-next, thanks! Did you use a script
> to find all occurences? Would be nice to know. Also, please take care of
> the subject line. "I2c" is misspelled.
Thanks your pointing out. I just manually reviewed the code when found this point.
Would like to try some auto-script but failed:)

Re: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[Wolfram Sang]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 350 bytes --]


> Thanks your pointing out. I just manually reviewed the code when found
> this point. Would like to try some auto-script but failed:)

I can suggest 'coccinelle' for that kind of job.

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

[PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[Wolfram Sang]

> Thanks your pointing out. I just manually reviewed the code when found
> this point. Would like to try some auto-script but failed:)

I can suggest 'coccinelle' for that kind of job.

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20121113/65f95058/attachment.sig>

RE: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[Liu, Chuansheng]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wolfram Sang [mailto:w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 3:58 PM
> To: Liu, Chuansheng
> Cc: linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org; linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org;
> linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org; linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of
> wait_for_completion_timeout
> 
> 
> > Thanks your pointing out. I just manually reviewed the code when found
> > this point. Would like to try some auto-script but failed:)
> 
> I can suggest 'coccinelle' for that kind of job.
Thanks, let me try, if possible anyone can give some help?
> 
> --
> Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang
> |
> Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/
> |

RE: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[Liu, Chuansheng]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wolfram Sang [mailto:w.sang@pengutronix.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 3:58 PM
> To: Liu, Chuansheng
> Cc: linus.walleij@linaro.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of
> wait_for_completion_timeout
> 
> 
> > Thanks your pointing out. I just manually reviewed the code when found
> > this point. Would like to try some auto-script but failed:)
> 
> I can suggest 'coccinelle' for that kind of job.
Thanks, let me try, if possible anyone can give some help?
> 
> --
> Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang
> |
> Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/
> |

[PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[Liu, Chuansheng]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wolfram Sang [mailto:w.sang at pengutronix.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 3:58 PM
> To: Liu, Chuansheng
> Cc: linus.walleij at linaro.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org;
> linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; linux-i2c at vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of
> wait_for_completion_timeout
> 
> 
> > Thanks your pointing out. I just manually reviewed the code when found
> > this point. Would like to try some auto-script but failed:)
> 
> I can suggest 'coccinelle' for that kind of job.
Thanks, let me try, if possible anyone can give some help?
> 
> --
> Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang
> |
> Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/
> |

Re: Fwd: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[Srinidhi Kasagar]

[...]

> From: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
> Date: Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 6:18 PM
> Subject: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout
> To: linus.walleij@linaro.org, w.sang@pengutronix.de
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chuansheng.liu@intel.com
> 
> 
> 
> The return value of wait_for_completion_timeout() is always
> >= 0 with unsigned int type.
> 
> So the condition "ret < 0" or "ret >= 0" is pointless.
> 
> Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c |   14 --------------
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c
> index 02c3115..8b2ffcf 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c
> @@ -435,13 +435,6 @@ static int read_i2c(struct nmk_i2c_dev *dev, u16 flags)
>         timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(
>                 &dev->xfer_complete, dev->adap.timeout);
> 
> -       if (timeout < 0) {
> -               dev_err(&dev->adev->dev,
> -                       "wait_for_completion_timeout "
> -                       "returned %d waiting for event\n", timeout);
> -               status = timeout;
> -       }
> -
No, it is wrong. You need to update the status variable in the case of timeout.
It is used further in nmk_i2c_xfer_one. You could perhaps use

if (timeout == 0) {
 ...and the rest of the code as is
}

regards/srinidhi

Re: Fwd: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[Srinidhi Kasagar]

[...]

> From: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
> Date: Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 6:18 PM
> Subject: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout
> To: linus.walleij@linaro.org, w.sang@pengutronix.de
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chuansheng.liu@intel.com
> 
> 
> 
> The return value of wait_for_completion_timeout() is always
> >= 0 with unsigned int type.
> 
> So the condition "ret < 0" or "ret >= 0" is pointless.
> 
> Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c |   14 --------------
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c
> index 02c3115..8b2ffcf 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c
> @@ -435,13 +435,6 @@ static int read_i2c(struct nmk_i2c_dev *dev, u16 flags)
>         timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(
>                 &dev->xfer_complete, dev->adap.timeout);
> 
> -       if (timeout < 0) {
> -               dev_err(&dev->adev->dev,
> -                       "wait_for_completion_timeout "
> -                       "returned %d waiting for event\n", timeout);
> -               status = timeout;
> -       }
> -
No, it is wrong. You need to update the status variable in the case of timeout.
It is used further in nmk_i2c_xfer_one. You could perhaps use

if (timeout == 0) {
 ...and the rest of the code as is
}

regards/srinidhi

Fwd: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[Srinidhi Kasagar]

[...]

> From: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
> Date: Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 6:18 PM
> Subject: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout
> To: linus.walleij at linaro.org, w.sang at pengutronix.de
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org,
> linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org, chuansheng.liu at intel.com
> 
> 
> 
> The return value of wait_for_completion_timeout() is always
> >= 0 with unsigned int type.
> 
> So the condition "ret < 0" or "ret >= 0" is pointless.
> 
> Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c |   14 --------------
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c
> index 02c3115..8b2ffcf 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c
> @@ -435,13 +435,6 @@ static int read_i2c(struct nmk_i2c_dev *dev, u16 flags)
>         timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(
>                 &dev->xfer_complete, dev->adap.timeout);
> 
> -       if (timeout < 0) {
> -               dev_err(&dev->adev->dev,
> -                       "wait_for_completion_timeout "
> -                       "returned %d waiting for event\n", timeout);
> -               status = timeout;
> -       }
> -
No, it is wrong. You need to update the status variable in the case of timeout.
It is used further in nmk_i2c_xfer_one. You could perhaps use

if (timeout == 0) {
 ...and the rest of the code as is
}

regards/srinidhi

Re: Fwd: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[Wolfram Sang]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 573 bytes --]


> > -       if (timeout < 0) {
> > -               dev_err(&dev->adev->dev,
> > -                       "wait_for_completion_timeout "
> > -                       "returned %d waiting for event\n", timeout);
> > -               status = timeout;
> > -       }
> > -
> No, it is wrong. You need to update the status variable in the case of timeout.

Looking at the patch context, such code comes later.

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: Fwd: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[Wolfram Sang]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 573 bytes --]


> > -       if (timeout < 0) {
> > -               dev_err(&dev->adev->dev,
> > -                       "wait_for_completion_timeout "
> > -                       "returned %d waiting for event\n", timeout);
> > -               status = timeout;
> > -       }
> > -
> No, it is wrong. You need to update the status variable in the case of timeout.

Looking at the patch context, such code comes later.

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Fwd: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[Wolfram Sang]

> > -       if (timeout < 0) {
> > -               dev_err(&dev->adev->dev,
> > -                       "wait_for_completion_timeout "
> > -                       "returned %d waiting for event\n", timeout);
> > -               status = timeout;
> > -       }
> > -
> No, it is wrong. You need to update the status variable in the case of timeout.

Looking at the patch context, such code comes later.

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20121115/f7edc23a/attachment.sig>

Re: Fwd: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[Srinidhi Kasagar]

On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:29:53 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
> > > -       if (timeout < 0) {
> > > -               dev_err(&dev->adev->dev,
> > > -                       "wait_for_completion_timeout "
> > > -                       "returned %d waiting for event\n", timeout);
> > > -               status = timeout;
> > > -       }
> > > -
> > No, it is wrong. You need to update the status variable in the case of timeout.
> 
> Looking at the patch context, such code comes later.
But it causes regressions; without looking at the "later" code, we can't afford merging
this code now.

regards/srinidhi

Re: Fwd: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[Srinidhi Kasagar]

On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:29:53 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
> > > -       if (timeout < 0) {
> > > -               dev_err(&dev->adev->dev,
> > > -                       "wait_for_completion_timeout "
> > > -                       "returned %d waiting for event\n", timeout);
> > > -               status = timeout;
> > > -       }
> > > -
> > No, it is wrong. You need to update the status variable in the case of timeout.
> 
> Looking at the patch context, such code comes later.
But it causes regressions; without looking at the "later" code, we can't afford merging
this code now.

regards/srinidhi

Fwd: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[Srinidhi Kasagar]

On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:29:53 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
> > > -       if (timeout < 0) {
> > > -               dev_err(&dev->adev->dev,
> > > -                       "wait_for_completion_timeout "
> > > -                       "returned %d waiting for event\n", timeout);
> > > -               status = timeout;
> > > -       }
> > > -
> > No, it is wrong. You need to update the status variable in the case of timeout.
> 
> Looking at the patch context, such code comes later.
But it causes regressions; without looking at the "later" code, we can't afford merging
this code now.

regards/srinidhi

Re: Fwd: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[Wolfram Sang]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 947 bytes --]

On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 03:27:42PM +0530, Srinidhi Kasagar wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:29:53 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > 
> > > > -       if (timeout < 0) {
> > > > -               dev_err(&dev->adev->dev,
> > > > -                       "wait_for_completion_timeout "
> > > > -                       "returned %d waiting for event\n", timeout);
> > > > -               status = timeout;
> > > > -       }
> > > > -
> > > No, it is wrong. You need to update the status variable in the case of timeout.
> > 
> > Looking at the patch context, such code comes later.
> But it causes regressions; without looking at the "later" code, we can't afford merging
> this code now.

Later as in "a few lines later" not "some time later". Or am I missing
something else?

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: Fwd: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[Wolfram Sang]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 947 bytes --]

On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 03:27:42PM +0530, Srinidhi Kasagar wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:29:53 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > 
> > > > -       if (timeout < 0) {
> > > > -               dev_err(&dev->adev->dev,
> > > > -                       "wait_for_completion_timeout "
> > > > -                       "returned %d waiting for event\n", timeout);
> > > > -               status = timeout;
> > > > -       }
> > > > -
> > > No, it is wrong. You need to update the status variable in the case of timeout.
> > 
> > Looking at the patch context, such code comes later.
> But it causes regressions; without looking at the "later" code, we can't afford merging
> this code now.

Later as in "a few lines later" not "some time later". Or am I missing
something else?

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Fwd: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[Wolfram Sang]

On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 03:27:42PM +0530, Srinidhi Kasagar wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:29:53 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > 
> > > > -       if (timeout < 0) {
> > > > -               dev_err(&dev->adev->dev,
> > > > -                       "wait_for_completion_timeout "
> > > > -                       "returned %d waiting for event\n", timeout);
> > > > -               status = timeout;
> > > > -       }
> > > > -
> > > No, it is wrong. You need to update the status variable in the case of timeout.
> > 
> > Looking at the patch context, such code comes later.
> But it causes regressions; without looking at the "later" code, we can't afford merging
> this code now.

Later as in "a few lines later" not "some time later". Or am I missing
something else?

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20121115/24943c8e/attachment.sig>

Re: Fwd: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[Srinidhi Kasagar]

On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:18:20 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 03:27:42PM +0530, Srinidhi Kasagar wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:29:53 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > 
> > > > > -       if (timeout < 0) {
> > > > > -               dev_err(&dev->adev->dev,
> > > > > -                       "wait_for_completion_timeout "
> > > > > -                       "returned %d waiting for event\n", timeout);
> > > > > -               status = timeout;
> > > > > -       }
> > > > > -
> > > > No, it is wrong. You need to update the status variable in the case of timeout.
> > > 
> > > Looking at the patch context, such code comes later.
> > But it causes regressions; without looking at the "later" code, we can't afford merging
> > this code now.
> 
> Later as in "a few lines later" not "some time later". Or am I missing
> something else?
I was too fast in reading emails after my short vacation...Sorry.

Acked-by: srinidhi kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar-0IS4wlFg1OjSUeElwK9/Pw@public.gmane.org>

regards/srinidhi

Re: Fwd: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[Srinidhi Kasagar]

On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:18:20 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 03:27:42PM +0530, Srinidhi Kasagar wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:29:53 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > 
> > > > > -       if (timeout < 0) {
> > > > > -               dev_err(&dev->adev->dev,
> > > > > -                       "wait_for_completion_timeout "
> > > > > -                       "returned %d waiting for event\n", timeout);
> > > > > -               status = timeout;
> > > > > -       }
> > > > > -
> > > > No, it is wrong. You need to update the status variable in the case of timeout.
> > > 
> > > Looking at the patch context, such code comes later.
> > But it causes regressions; without looking at the "later" code, we can't afford merging
> > this code now.
> 
> Later as in "a few lines later" not "some time later". Or am I missing
> something else?
I was too fast in reading emails after my short vacation...Sorry.

Acked-by: srinidhi kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com>

regards/srinidhi

Fwd: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[Srinidhi Kasagar]

On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:18:20 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 03:27:42PM +0530, Srinidhi Kasagar wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:29:53 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > 
> > > > > -       if (timeout < 0) {
> > > > > -               dev_err(&dev->adev->dev,
> > > > > -                       "wait_for_completion_timeout "
> > > > > -                       "returned %d waiting for event\n", timeout);
> > > > > -               status = timeout;
> > > > > -       }
> > > > > -
> > > > No, it is wrong. You need to update the status variable in the case of timeout.
> > > 
> > > Looking at the patch context, such code comes later.
> > But it causes regressions; without looking at the "later" code, we can't afford merging
> > this code now.
> 
> Later as in "a few lines later" not "some time later". Or am I missing
> something else?
I was too fast in reading emails after my short vacation...Sorry.

Acked-by: srinidhi kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com>

regards/srinidhi

Re: [PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[Chuansheng Liu]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1118 bytes --]

timeout is never < 0, so status = timeout is never getting run. This patch delete pointless
code. Could you show the regression? Thanks.

在 2012-11-15，17:57，Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com> 写道：

> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:29:53 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> 
>>>> -       if (timeout < 0) {
>>>> -               dev_err(&dev->adev->dev,
>>>> -                       "wait_for_completion_timeout "
>>>> -                       "returned %d waiting for event\n", timeout);
>>>> -               status = timeout;
>>>> -       }
>>>> -
>>> No, it is wrong. You need to update the status variable in the case of timeout.
>> 
>> Looking at the patch context, such code comes later.
> But it causes regressions; without looking at the "later" code, we can't afford merging
> this code now.
> 
> regards/srinidhi
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3802 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 1/7] I2c-nomadik: Fix the usage of wait_for_completion_timeout

[Chuansheng Liu]

timeout is never < 0, so status = timeout is never getting run. This patch delete pointless
code. Could you show the regression? Thanks.

? 2012-11-15?17:57?Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com> ???

> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:29:53 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> 
>>>> -       if (timeout < 0) {
>>>> -               dev_err(&dev->adev->dev,
>>>> -                       "wait_for_completion_timeout "
>>>> -                       "returned %d waiting for event\n", timeout);
>>>> -               status = timeout;
>>>> -       }
>>>> -
>>> No, it is wrong. You need to update the status variable in the case of timeout.
>> 
>> Looking at the patch context, such code comes later.
> But it causes regressions; without looking at the "later" code, we can't afford merging
> this code now.
> 
> regards/srinidhi
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20121115/0f1d0c0f/attachment-0001.html>