From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@elliptictech.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scatterlist: don't BUG when we can trivially return a proper error.
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:15:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121114221544.GA3083@elliptictech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121114130500.250dd5b8.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On 2012-11-14 13:05 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 15:03:00 -0400
> Nick Bowler <nbowler@elliptictech.com> wrote:
>
> > There is absolutely no reason to crash the kernel when we have a
> > perfectly good return value already available to use for conveying
> > failure status.
>
> Yes, I suppose that's true. I don't see a case for BUGging the kernel
> here.
[...]
> > - BUG_ON(nents > max_ents);
> > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(nents > max_ents))
> > + return -E2BIG;
> > #endif
>
> OK, pet peeve: if this E2BIG gets returned to userspace, our poor user
> will look it up and see "Argument list too long; used when the
> arguments passed to a new program being executed with one of the exec
> functions occupy too much memory space". He then gets to spend half a
> day reviewing his code's exec() callsites!
>
> See? Although the error's name sounds like a nice match to the
> internal state, it isn't really a match at all and our use of it is
> misleading.
>
> Unfortunately there is no EKERNELSCREWEDUP,
Well, maybe we should add it! :P
> so we usually use EINVAL.
Fair enough. I will prepare v2. But perhaps EOPNOTSUPP would be a
better fit?
Thanks,
--
Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-14 22:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-01 19:03 [PATCH] scatterlist: don't BUG when we can trivially return a proper error Nick Bowler
2012-11-14 21:05 ` Andrew Morton
2012-11-14 22:15 ` Nick Bowler [this message]
2012-11-14 22:27 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2012-11-14 22:30 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121114221544.GA3083@elliptictech.com \
--to=nbowler@elliptictech.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.