From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: Standardise capability type Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:47:14 +0000 Message-ID: <201211151147.14858.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1352896551-17948-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:58966 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2993197Ab2KOLrZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Nov 2012 06:47:25 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Lee Jones , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linus.walleij@stericsson.com, Chris Ball , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 15 November 2012, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > > > There are discrepancies with regards to how MMC capabilities > > are carried throughout the subsystem. Let's standardise them > > to elevate any confusion. > > > > Cc: Chris Ball > > Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones > > Looks good to me, and these are obviously > u32 bitfields by design, so: > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:47:14 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] mmc: Standardise capability type In-Reply-To: References: <1352896551-17948-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> Message-ID: <201211151147.14858.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thursday 15 November 2012, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > > > There are discrepancies with regards to how MMC capabilities > > are carried throughout the subsystem. Let's standardise them > > to elevate any confusion. > > > > Cc: Chris Ball > > Cc: linux-mmc at vger.kernel.org > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones > > Looks good to me, and these are obviously > u32 bitfields by design, so: > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann