From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: s.hauer@pengutronix.de (Sascha Hauer) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:44:32 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: mx27: Add VPU support In-Reply-To: References: <1352917238-29694-1-git-send-email-fabio.estevam@freescale.com> <20121115081223.GY10369@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <20121115134432.GG10369@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:38:01AM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 6:12 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > As Eric mentioned this may lead to problems on the i.MX27L without VPU. > > Do you have the possibility to test this? > > I do not have any board with a MX27L variant. Maybe we could try > reading the SREV info register to distinguish between MX27 and MX27L. > MX27RM does not provide any info on this though. If that works I would prefer this, but I also have no i.MX27L to test it. Otherwise doing it like v1 is the best we can do. You should probably put the changes to Javiers board into a separate patch so that Javier can Ack it indepently of what we are coming up with. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |