From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Frysinger Subject: Re: RFC: New release for DTC? Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 12:50:07 -0500 Message-ID: <201211171250.08597.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <201208232015.39613.yann.morin.1998@free.fr> <20120824013625.GA8067@truffula.fritz.box> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0983000935804960350==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120824013625.GA8067-W9XWwYn+TF0XU02nzanrWNbf9cGiqdzd@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: "devicetree-discuss" To: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --===============0983000935804960350== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart8633822.OTPJloS4MA"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --nextPart8633822.OTPJloS4MA Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thursday 23 August 2012 21:36:25 David Gibson wrote: > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 08:15:39PM +0200, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > > Following advice from Jon Loeliger, I would suggest that a new release > > of DTC be tagged and packaged. > >=20 > > It is important for some projects to rely on a released version, rather > > than use a random cset from the repository. Comes to mind, the automated > > build-systems, such as buildroot. > >=20 > > Of course, I can help, if need be! ;-) > >=20 > > Are there any others who think that a release would make sense? >=20 > This has been a bit of a perrenial problem. dtc development has been > sufficiently gradual that there haven't been many obvious points for > making new releases. dtc developers (i.e. Jon and my, mostly) don't > feel much pain from the lack of releases, since the git snapshots > generally work well (thanks to limited scope and a good testsuite). >=20 > I wonder if we should move to a model of just making a release every 3 > or 6 months from whatever happens to be in the tree at the time > (barring obvious known breakage, of course). yes please. even just a version that uses datestamps would be fine. =2Dmike --nextPart8633822.OTPJloS4MA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJQp85QAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBw9IP/AoCztahedyivDokyXBAUTeR tvEMyAqLJ8P/S6rq5y/Xq9e2BbOVEq10dsVbTRsGpaMvD8X8OLF/shVWxLipLg82 +IpcsEfXxKTx8GGvo7YLBv3PI7jlFSoTEX8bDdWddCnV275Jc5VUmg7Ht8Xm9g6x k+3FyMNq7mGRoDdDDK3iMd9QZ2nDGeC8J2k6FvPFlvp4BmmDsTHMtA6IR7QB/aCY 2t/s/pGpGgF1UlHYBMVzR3pJTkHkVc19fKGVn5q0QCbzA0TMbdWdF7wt9YSLqkgd 3xxA3pFp6sOgity2wTifdz8jFHG4mxY7u19MTv5Z7RzmkOOoxBuc9wpuTVXS5yWG b4/hgFSKXjtdnDMHDu+/PqnkrRiV9BlEtjvLPYaSWqVqwSqAQDlrKNMk6saAUW/W UVrKbFfjuLRWDKZilOqQjmKpy7T6ULVsoE5j4hguKnjeLU6op6ab5oDWcXvAJnDh vIhgcLJELvX59S+v3QDNjhOqarZZvTmtOeVTioDCal9Ughn3BfycmlbCuOUP0HNb p+hzc0UnN7G/EDX9NVfkiD/dm7c2gGXTUvIyBqE47sOnrUXowvi0xgnS8KH3IJV3 srC88Y50gImIZHtCMxtcciq1IUidzjxV5PkLLVzKEy3g6Tp79p9qWgegfB3xhti/ TCSPNtqsCBDgEwALmf8O =jbGz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart8633822.OTPJloS4MA-- --===============0983000935804960350== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss --===============0983000935804960350==--