From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
ben-linux@fluff.org, w.sang@pengutronix.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org,
rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com,
grant.likely@secretlab.ca, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3 UPDATED] i2c / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration support
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 17:55:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121118155539.GE17774@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3790210.BPELRzTIaN@vostro.rjw.lan>
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 12:24:45PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Well, maybe there is one. Perhaps we can make acpi_platform_notify()
> call acpi_bind_one() upfront and only if that fails, do the whole
> type->find_device() dance? Of course, acpi_bind_one() would need to
> be modified slightly too, like in the patch below.
>
> If we did that, acpi_i2c_add_device() would only need to assign acpi_handle
> as appropriate before calling i2c_new_device() (and analogously for SPI).
>
> What do you think?
This is certainly better than the thing we use currently. It makes adding
I2C and SPI support much shorter and simpler. If others don't object I
would suggest that we switch to use this method.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-18 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-15 11:03 [PATCH v2 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C Mika Westerberg
2012-11-15 11:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] gpio / ACPI: add ACPI support Mika Westerberg
2012-11-16 1:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16 6:54 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-16 8:05 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-16 8:12 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-16 10:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16 12:49 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-16 10:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-15 11:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] spi / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration support Mika Westerberg
2012-11-16 10:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-17 10:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-17 10:18 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-15 11:03 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] i2c " Mika Westerberg
2012-11-16 10:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16 13:03 ` Jean Delvare
2012-11-16 13:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16 13:42 ` Jean Delvare
2012-11-16 14:17 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-16 15:23 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-16 16:47 ` Jean Delvare
2012-11-16 17:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/3 UPDATED] " Mika Westerberg
2012-11-16 18:12 ` Jean Delvare
2012-11-17 6:46 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-11-17 8:03 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-17 9:55 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-19 22:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-11-19 23:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-19 23:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 7:07 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-17 11:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-18 15:55 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2012-11-18 21:10 ` [PATCH 0/2] ACPI: Simplify "glueing" to physical nodes (was: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3 UPDATED] i2c / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration support) Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-18 21:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] ACPI: Allow ACPI handles of devices to be initialized in advance Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-19 9:42 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-19 12:33 ` [Update][PATCH " Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-18 21:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] ACPI / platform: Initialize ACPI handles of platform devices " Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-19 16:23 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-19 17:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-19 17:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-19 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-19 21:05 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-19 21:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-19 22:32 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-19 22:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-19 18:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-19 22:31 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-19 22:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 0:55 ` [Update][PATCH 0/3] ACPI: Simplify "glueing" to physical nodes Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 0:57 ` [Update][PATCH 1/3] ACPI: Allow ACPI handles of devices to be initialized in advance Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 0:59 ` [Update][PATCH 2/3] ACPI / driver core: Introduce struct acpi_dev_node and related macros Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 9:10 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-20 9:34 ` [Update 2][PATCH " Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 12:57 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-20 18:08 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-20 1:01 ` [Update][PATCH 3/3] ACPI / platform: Initialize ACPI handles of platform devices in advance Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 18:08 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-20 9:11 ` [Update][PATCH 0/3] ACPI: Simplify "glueing" to physical nodes Mika Westerberg
2012-11-20 9:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 18:09 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-20 21:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16 20:02 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] i2c / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration support Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16 20:09 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-16 20:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 10:29 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C Mika Westerberg
2012-11-20 10:29 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] gpio / ACPI: add ACPI support Mika Westerberg
2012-11-20 12:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 10:29 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] spi / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration support Mika Westerberg
2012-11-20 13:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 13:15 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-20 13:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 10:29 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] i2c " Mika Westerberg
2012-11-20 13:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 13:57 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-20 18:13 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C Mika Westerberg
2012-11-20 18:13 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] gpio / ACPI: add ACPI support Mika Westerberg
2012-11-30 11:20 ` Grant Likely
2012-11-30 11:20 ` Grant Likely
2012-11-30 11:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 18:13 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] spi / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration support Mika Westerberg
2012-11-30 11:24 ` Grant Likely
2012-11-30 11:24 ` Grant Likely
2012-11-30 11:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 18:13 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] i2c " Mika Westerberg
2012-11-21 21:31 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-21 21:54 ` Jean Delvare
2012-11-23 11:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-22 1:36 ` Mark Brown
2012-11-22 9:43 ` Linus Walleij
2012-11-22 10:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-28 12:36 ` Mika Westerberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121118155539.GE17774@intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.