From: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, jeff.liu@oracle.com,
hughd@google.com, xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com,
achender@linux.vnet.ibm.com, lczerner@redhat.com,
Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8 v3] ext4: extent status tree (step 1)
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:28:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121119052859.GA22442@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121119031725.GA24414@thunk.org>
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 10:17:25PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 09:23:37PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Here is the v3 of extent status tree. In this version, the biggest change is
> > the i_es_lock (a rwlock_t) instead of i_data_sem, which is introduced to protect
> > extent status tree. Moreover I improve the SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE. In previous
> > version, the unwritten extent is as a data, and now it will lookup page cache to
> > determine it as a data or a hole. When it has some data at the given range, the
> > unwritten extent will be as a data. Otherwise, it will be as a hole. Other
> > changes contain some bug fixes.
>
> I don't think I ack'ed this patch series earlier; my apologies. In
> any case (with the comment fixup we discussed earlier), It's currently
> queued for the next merge window.
Thanks. :-)
BTW, I am trying to implement the second step of extent status tree,
which will track all extent status for an inode. After that, some
improvements will be added, such as extent-level locking, etc.
Regards,
- Zheng
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-19 5:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-26 13:23 [PATCH 0/8 v3] ext4: extent status tree (step 1) Zheng Liu
2012-10-26 13:23 ` [PATCH 1/8 v3] ext4: add two structures supporting extent status tree Zheng Liu
2012-10-26 13:23 ` [PATCH 2/8 v3] ext4: add operations on " Zheng Liu
2012-11-08 23:21 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-11-09 2:22 ` Zheng Liu
2012-10-26 13:23 ` [PATCH 3/8 v3] ext4: initialize " Zheng Liu
2012-10-26 13:23 ` [PATCH 4/8 v3] ext4: let ext4 maintain " Zheng Liu
2012-10-26 13:23 ` [PATCH 5/8 v3] ext4: add some tracepoints in " Zheng Liu
2012-10-26 13:23 ` [PATCH 6/8 v3] ext4: reimplement ext4_find_delay_alloc_range on " Zheng Liu
2012-10-26 13:23 ` [PATCH 7/8 v3] ext4: reimplement fiemap " Zheng Liu
2012-10-26 13:23 ` [PATCH 8/8 v3] ext4: introduce lseek SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE support Zheng Liu
2012-10-27 10:05 ` Jeff Liu
2012-10-27 15:30 ` Zheng Liu
2012-11-19 3:17 ` [PATCH 0/8 v3] ext4: extent status tree (step 1) Theodore Ts'o
2012-11-19 5:28 ` Zheng Liu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121119052859.GA22442@gmail.com \
--to=gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com \
--cc=achender@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jeff.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=wenqing.lz@taobao.com \
--cc=xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.