From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from vms173003pub.verizon.net (vms173003pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.3]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4AA3E0141C for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 10:13:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([unknown] [71.191.205.12]) by vms173003.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0MDS004UATAXZEG1@vms173003.mailsrvcs.net> for meta-ti@yoctoproject.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 12:13:47 -0600 (CST) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C8F05201CF; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 13:13:45 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 13:13:45 -0500 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Nicolas Dechesne Message-id: <20121120181345.GC19309@denix.org> References: MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: "meta-ti@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: xf86-video-omap and libdrm for OMAP X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 18:13:59 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 06:10:17PM +0100, Nicolas Dechesne wrote: > well.. obviously, with the libdrm update, and our .bbappend in meta-ti > things are even worse than I had thought... and the tree doesn't even build > anymore, at least for panda, as we have: > > COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "omap4|omap5" > > in the .bbappend > > so now that brings another question... should we start a 'danny' branch on > meta-ti? if we remove the libdrm and xf86-video-omap recipes from > meta-ti/master, then we break meta-ti/master with poky/danny... Yes, creating danny branch was on my list - was waiting for any specific requirements like this one... :) -- Denys > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Nicolas Dechesne wrote: > > > hi > > > > i just noticed that the recipe for xf86-video-omap was just merged into > > poky/master, and that libdrm was updated as well (and OMAP experimental > > support was enabled too): > > > > 0ed7c53 xf86-video-omap: add new recipe to follow the maintained repo > > cb758f9 libdrm: upgrade to 2.4.40 > > > > from a quick review, i believe this should supersede the recipes from > > meta-ti that got merged recently: > > > > 410dc02 xf86-video-omap: add new recipe for OMAP4/5 X11 video driver > > cce5a7a libdrm: enable omap experimental api support > > > > i won't be able to get that tested in the next couple of days, very > > likely, so i wanted to know: > > > > - if anyone tested poky/master (or oe-core as this came from oe-core) on > > panda and/or beagle? > > - what is the policy in this situation? should we simply remove our > > recipes from meta-ti? > > > > cheers > > > > nicolas > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > meta-ti mailing list > meta-ti@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti