From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 10.mo3.mail-out.ovh.net ([87.98.165.232] helo=mo3.mail-out.ovh.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TbCYF-0002WL-Ac for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 16:49:23 +0100 Received: from mail637.ha.ovh.net (b7.ovh.net [213.186.33.57]) by mo3.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with SMTP id E700CFF938C for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 16:28:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queueout) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 21 Nov 2012 17:17:38 +0200 Received: from pac33-2-82-240-38-71.fbx.proxad.net (HELO eb-e6520) (eric%eukrea.com@82.240.38.71) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 21 Nov 2012 17:17:37 +0200 Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 16:17:12 +0100 From: Eric =?ISO-8859-1?B?QuluYXJk?= To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Ovh-Mailout: 178.32.228.3 (mo3.mail-out.ovh.net) Message-ID: <20121121161712.030af137@eb-e6520> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: =?ISO-8859-1?B?RXVrculh?= Electromatique X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 17334636441388494153 X-Ovh-Remote: 82.240.38.71 (pac33-2-82-240-38-71.fbx.proxad.net) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-OVH-SPAMSTATE: OK X-OVH-SPAMSCORE: 0 X-OVH-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeehgedrudejucetufdoteggodetrfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecuhfhrohhmpefgrhhitgcuueornhgrrhguuceovghrihgtsegvuhhkrhgvrgdrtghomheqnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfgjfhhoofggtgfgsehtqhertdertddu X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.50001/N X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: 0 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeehgedrudejucetufdoteggodetrfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecuhfhrohhmpefgrhhitgcuueornhgrrhguuceovghrihgtsegvuhhkrhgvrgdrtghomheqnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfgjfhhoofggtgfgsehtqhertdertddu Cc: koen@dominion.thruhere.net Subject: Re: yocto 1.3 branch for meta-openembedded layers, RFC wanted. X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:49:23 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Koen, Le Thu, 25 Oct 2012 12:55:47 +0200, Koen Kooi a =E9crit : > As for branch maintenance: any volunteers for managing the meta-openembed= ded > 'danny' branches? There doesn't need to be a single maintainer, but it wo= uld > be nice to have one person coordinating everything, even if it's just > pulling in danny-next branches from the layer maintainers every week or s= o. >=20 > As I said above, I'm swamped for the next 3 weeks, so can people who have > used or are using the 'denzil' branch weigh in with feedback/anecdotes/et= c? > I have such a document for oe-core 'denzil', which I keep failing to send > out, but it boils down to "better predictability for merge windows". Plea= se > share your experience for meta-oe here. >=20 if wanted I can continue to handle denzil and also danny branches (and should have more time than for denzil). Eric