From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bear.ext.ti.com (bear.ext.ti.com [192.94.94.41]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A29D5E00294; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:39:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from dlelxv30.itg.ti.com ([172.17.2.17]) by bear.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id qALNdsJ1024700; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:39:54 -0600 Received: from DFLE72.ent.ti.com (dfle72.ent.ti.com [128.247.5.109]) by dlelxv30.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qALNdsXg003603; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:39:54 -0600 Received: from dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (172.17.1.197) by dfle72.ent.ti.com (128.247.5.109) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.323.3; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:39:54 -0600 Received: from localhost ([158.218.102.158]) by dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qALNdsv8024400; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:39:54 -0600 Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 18:39:54 -0500 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Nicolas Dechesne Message-ID: <20121121233953.GD11734@edge> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:43:14 -0800 Cc: "meta-ti@yoctoproject.org" , rob@ti.com, yocto Subject: Re: [meta-ti] build failure with xf86-video-omap X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 23:39:56 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:26:12AM +0100, Nicolas Dechesne wrote: > looping rob clark (upstream author) > > > On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > > On 21 November 2012 22:52, Nicolas Dechesne wrote: > > > since xf86-video-omap was recently merged in oe-core and poky, i am > > trying > > > to remove the recipes we had staged in meta-ti trees for some weeks > > > ( > > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-ti/commit/?id=410dc026f2ee24a2346e7563a83f0181c79809cf > > ). > > > so i was trying to build poky/master with meta-ti/master, for > > pandaboard, > > > and I get build failures in xf86-video-omap [1] and [2]. > > > > > > so [1] is actually trivial, as we are missing a DEPENDS in the recipe, i > > can > > > send a patch in oe-core for that. > > > > Please do. > > > > sure, will do. > > > > > > [2] is a bit more cryptic to me.. so I quickly tried to build with danny > > ( i > > > just cherry picked the commit that introduced xf86-video-omap from > > master) > > > and this time it built fine. > > > > > > has anyone actually tested this recipe? if so I must be doing something > > > wrong, any hint would be helpful. > > > > This was discussed a few hours ago. It's caused by a) the > > configure.ac being broken and b) the workaround for this being removed > > by me in e828faf027540bc5def8b7371a959884caad9557 (which is in master > > only). Presumably this code was test built before that patch landed. > > > > As this is a genuine upstream bug (ARM-specific driver that doesn't > > cross-compile?!) I've just filed fdo #57386. > > > > i suspect you opened a OE bug, since I can't find it in yocto BZ, however > bugs.openembedded.org doesn't seem to answer at the moment.. AFAIK, OE bugzilla was deprecated some time ago. We were considering taking it down, as a matter of fact. OE-Core issues are logged into Yocto bugzilla. Not sure where Ross filed this one though. > so, I checked our configure.ac , and clearly, that needs some love... > > Rob: any chance you can look into that? it's the xf86-video-omap > configure.ac file that's wrong, we should mimic what's in the > xf-video-intel one i guess.. otherwise i can try later this week. -- Denys From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bear.ext.ti.com (bear.ext.ti.com [192.94.94.41]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A29D5E00294; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:39:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from dlelxv30.itg.ti.com ([172.17.2.17]) by bear.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id qALNdsJ1024700; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:39:54 -0600 Received: from DFLE72.ent.ti.com (dfle72.ent.ti.com [128.247.5.109]) by dlelxv30.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qALNdsXg003603; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:39:54 -0600 Received: from dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (172.17.1.197) by dfle72.ent.ti.com (128.247.5.109) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.323.3; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:39:54 -0600 Received: from localhost ([158.218.102.158]) by dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qALNdsv8024400; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:39:54 -0600 Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 18:39:54 -0500 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Nicolas Dechesne Message-ID: <20121121233953.GD11734@edge> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: "meta-ti@yoctoproject.org" , rob@ti.com, "Burton, Ross" , yocto Subject: Re: [yocto] build failure with xf86-video-omap X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 23:39:56 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:26:12AM +0100, Nicolas Dechesne wrote: > looping rob clark (upstream author) > > > On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > > On 21 November 2012 22:52, Nicolas Dechesne wrote: > > > since xf86-video-omap was recently merged in oe-core and poky, i am > > trying > > > to remove the recipes we had staged in meta-ti trees for some weeks > > > ( > > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-ti/commit/?id=410dc026f2ee24a2346e7563a83f0181c79809cf > > ). > > > so i was trying to build poky/master with meta-ti/master, for > > pandaboard, > > > and I get build failures in xf86-video-omap [1] and [2]. > > > > > > so [1] is actually trivial, as we are missing a DEPENDS in the recipe, i > > can > > > send a patch in oe-core for that. > > > > Please do. > > > > sure, will do. > > > > > > [2] is a bit more cryptic to me.. so I quickly tried to build with danny > > ( i > > > just cherry picked the commit that introduced xf86-video-omap from > > master) > > > and this time it built fine. > > > > > > has anyone actually tested this recipe? if so I must be doing something > > > wrong, any hint would be helpful. > > > > This was discussed a few hours ago. It's caused by a) the > > configure.ac being broken and b) the workaround for this being removed > > by me in e828faf027540bc5def8b7371a959884caad9557 (which is in master > > only). Presumably this code was test built before that patch landed. > > > > As this is a genuine upstream bug (ARM-specific driver that doesn't > > cross-compile?!) I've just filed fdo #57386. > > > > i suspect you opened a OE bug, since I can't find it in yocto BZ, however > bugs.openembedded.org doesn't seem to answer at the moment.. AFAIK, OE bugzilla was deprecated some time ago. We were considering taking it down, as a matter of fact. OE-Core issues are logged into Yocto bugzilla. Not sure where Ross filed this one though. > so, I checked our configure.ac , and clearly, that needs some love... > > Rob: any chance you can look into that? it's the xf86-video-omap > configure.ac file that's wrong, we should mimic what's in the > xf-video-intel one i guess.. otherwise i can try later this week. -- Denys