From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.skyhub.de (mail.skyhub.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:120:8448::d00d]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 212D62C008C for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 21:07:11 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 11:06:35 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH 056/493] edac: remove use of __devexit_p Message-ID: <20121123100635.GC18765@x1.alien8.de> References: <1353349642-3677-1-git-send-email-wfp5p@virginia.edu> <1353349642-3677-56-git-send-email-wfp5p@virginia.edu> <20121122134451.GG17147@x1.alien8.de> <20121122182222.GB25392@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: <20121122182222.GB25392@kroah.com> Cc: "Arvind R." , Mark Gross , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Jason Uhlenkott , Ranganathan Desikan , Bill Pemberton , Egor Martovetsky , Doug Thompson , Olof Johansson , linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Tim Small List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:22:22AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 02:44:51PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 01:20:05PM -0500, Bill Pemberton wrote: > > > CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option so __devexit_p is no longer > > > needed. > > > > Erm, I don't understand. __devexit_p is defined also for modules not > > only for CONFIG_HOTPLUG: > > > > #if defined(MODULE) || defined(CONFIG_HOTPLUG) > > #define __devexit_p(x) x > > #else > > #define __devexit_p(x) NULL > > #endif > > > > AFAICT, we cannot remove it yet no? > > If MODULE is defined, it defaults to nothing. And now that > CONFIG_HOTPLUG is always set to Y, this always defaults to nothing. Huh, if MODULE is defined, __devexit_p(x) evaluates to the function name 'x' itself, AFAICT. So, if MODULE is defined and we have a reference from retained sections to a discarded section (I'm rereading the comment over __devexit_p in btw) then we'll get linker errors so we'd still need the ifdef thing, no? What am I missing? Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris.