From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "azurIt" Subject: =?utf-8?q?Re=3A_memory=2Dcgroup_bug?= Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 13:36:02 +0100 Message-ID: <20121125133602.CF488229@pobox.sk> References: <20121121200207.01068046@pobox.sk>, <20121122152441.GA9609@dhcp22.suse.cz>, <20121122190526.390C7A28@pobox.sk>, <20121122214249.GA20319@dhcp22.suse.cz>, <20121122233434.3D5E35E6@pobox.sk>, <20121123074023.GA24698@dhcp22.suse.cz>, <20121123102137.10D6D653@pobox.sk>, <20121123100438.GF24698@dhcp22.suse.cz>, <20121125011047.7477BB5E@pobox.sk> <20121125120524.GB10623@dhcp22.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20121125120524.GB10623@dhcp22.suse.cz> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: =?utf-8?q?Michal_Hocko?= Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, =?utf-8?q?cgroups_mailinglist?= , =?utf-8?q?KAMEZAWA_Hiroyuki?= >So there is a lot of attempts to allocate which fail, every second! Yes, as i said, the cgroup was taking 100% of (allocated) CPU core(s). No= t sure if all processes were using CPU but _few_ of them (not only one) f= or sure. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752720Ab2KYMgH (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Nov 2012 07:36:07 -0500 Received: from gmmr5.centrum.cz ([46.255.225.250]:42604 "EHLO gmmr5.centrum.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751923Ab2KYMgG (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Nov 2012 07:36:06 -0500 To: =?utf-8?q?Michal_Hocko?= Subject: =?utf-8?q?Re=3A_memory=2Dcgroup_bug?= Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 13:36:02 +0100 From: "azurIt" Cc: , , =?utf-8?q?cgroups_mailinglist?= , =?utf-8?q?KAMEZAWA_Hiroyuki?= References: <20121121200207.01068046@pobox.sk>, <20121122152441.GA9609@dhcp22.suse.cz>, <20121122190526.390C7A28@pobox.sk>, <20121122214249.GA20319@dhcp22.suse.cz>, <20121122233434.3D5E35E6@pobox.sk>, <20121123074023.GA24698@dhcp22.suse.cz>, <20121123102137.10D6D653@pobox.sk>, <20121123100438.GF24698@dhcp22.suse.cz>, <20121125011047.7477BB5E@pobox.sk> <20121125120524.GB10623@dhcp22.suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <20121125120524.GB10623@dhcp22.suse.cz> X-Mailer: Centrum Email 5.3 X-Priority: 3 X-Original-From: azurit@pobox.sk MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20121125133602.CF488229@pobox.sk> X-Maser: brud Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >So there is a lot of attempts to allocate which fail, every second! Yes, as i said, the cgroup was taking 100% of (allocated) CPU core(s). Not sure if all processes were using CPU but _few_ of them (not only one) for sure.