From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: When constructing the bus id consider assigned-addresses as well
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 11:20:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121126182054.GA30177@obsidianresearch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121126140316.99FE23E194B@localhost>
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 02:03:16PM +0000, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 14:02:40 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> wrote:
> > 'assigned-addresses' is used for certain PCI device type nodes in
> > lieu of 'reg', since this is enforced by of/address.c, have
> > of_device_make_bus_id look there as well.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
>
> If it is a PCI device, then of_device_make_bus_id() shouldn't come into
> play. PCI devices already have their own naming scheme. Only
> platform_bus device creation uses of_device_make_bus_id(). What am I
> missing?
In my embedded case I have a complex PCI-E connected SOC device.
This is modeled in OF by having a PCI-E bus, a PCI-E device node, and
then all of the SOC devices (I2C, GPIO, drivers, etc) placed under the
PCI-E device node.
The PCI driver that matches the device just turns it on and calls
of_platform_populate(..) with its own node as an argument.
So of_device_make_bus_id isn't called on a PCI-E device node, it is
called on the platform_device children of that node, and due to the
way the other code works, and what the OF rules seem to be, those
childen all use assigned-addresses. Without this patch the code just
assigns monotonic ids to those nodes.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-26 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-21 21:02 [PATCH] of: When constructing the bus id consider assigned-addresses as well Jason Gunthorpe
2012-11-26 14:03 ` Grant Likely
2012-11-26 18:20 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2012-11-29 16:26 ` Grant Likely
2012-11-29 19:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2012-11-30 9:48 ` Grant Likely
2012-12-01 0:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2012-12-03 14:27 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121126182054.GA30177@obsidianresearch.com \
--to=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.