From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 18:54:14 +0000 Subject: [GIT PULL] ARM: ixp4xx: fixes for v3.7 In-Reply-To: References: <0Lufa8-1TAtF11yb2-00zw9g@mx.kundenserver.de> <201211261314.32662.arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: <201211261854.14248.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Monday 26 November 2012, Olof Johansson wrote: > > Olof, I'm undecided whether they are still appropriate for 3.7 since > > we're past the final -rc now. If we want them in, we should probably > > send them to Linus now and let him decide. For all I can tell, ixp4xx > > is already completely broken without these patches, so there should be > > no harm in including them, but then again " 13 files changed, 59 > > insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)" is slightly more than I'd like to send > > at this point. > > > > If you prefer, we can put them into next/fixes-non-critical, but then we > > might want to mark more of them as candidates for stable. > > Since the code has been broken for quite a while, I don't see a big > urgency to get it in in the last week of a new release, but I can > easily be persuaded differently. Had I done the pull, I would probably > have merged them into fixes-non-critical myself. I've just done a few pulls that I've found in my email backlog, but it seems you already had everything under control, I was expecting more work to be left over. I probably woudn't have started if I had known it was this little. At least I have a good feeling about not having missed anything important now. > But, as I said, I don't have strong opinions on the matter. :) I can send the pull request(s) for the fixes this time, so at least Linus doesn't blame you for what I pulled in ;-) Arnd