From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Performance issue
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 21:56:35 +0200
Message-ID: <20121128195635.GA17065@redhat.com>
References: <CAMxNYaY-S6HCkiEfyP3kHq9_BPstV+kG8Hfvj3-5t9CAVa-_hA@mail.gmail.com>
 <201211272238.38614.vrozenfe@redhat.com>
 <CAMxNYaY1WQOw-D_3fc9AQgqnpyLFd6EM4TqXGH5tXa6EPvqc5w@mail.gmail.com>
 <201211281339.17589.vrozenfe@redhat.com>
 <CAMxNYaZ_oB+TnhKZ2zGoUTKVd+=jGk74oqxi5ZkJUaw33QOm1A@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Cc: Vadim Rozenfeld <vrozenfe@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: George-Cristian =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=AErzan?= <gc@birzan.org>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60446 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753154Ab2K1T4h convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:56:37 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMxNYaZ_oB+TnhKZ2zGoUTKVd+=jGk74oqxi5ZkJUaw33QOm1A@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 09:18:38PM +0200, George-Cristian B=C3=AErzan w=
rote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Vadim Rozenfeld <vrozenfe@redhat.com=
> wrote:
> > There are two patches, one for kvm and another one for qemu.
>=20
> I just realised this. I was supposed to use qemu, or qemu-kvm? I used=
 qemu
>=20
Does not matter, but you need to also recompile kernel with the first p=
atch.

--
			Gleb.