From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fengguang Wu Subject: Re: [xen:stable/for-linus-3.8 4/8] include/xen/interface/version.h:72:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'xen_domain' Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 10:21:25 +0800 Message-ID: <20121129022125.GG5785@localhost> References: <50b68452.Gqr1L/cRkHFh1xmK%fengguang.wu@intel.com> <20121128221510.GA29950@phenom.dumpdata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121128221510.GA29950@phenom.dumpdata.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: "Liu, Jinsong" , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Jan Beulich List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 05:15:10PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 05:38:26AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote: > > tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git stable/for-linus-3.8 > > head: 394b40f62d7ae18a1c48c13fc483b8193f8c3a98 > > commit: 92e3229dcdc80ff0b6304f14c578d76e7e10e226 [4/8] xen/acpi: ACPI PAD driver > > config: x86_64-randconfig-x701 (attached as .config) > > > > Note: the xen/stable/for-linus-3.8 HEAD 394b40f builds fine. > > It only hurts bisectibility. > > > > All error/warnings: > > > > In file included from drivers/xen/features.c:15:0: > > include/xen/interface/version.h: In function 'xen_running_on_version_or_later': > > include/xen/interface/version.h:72:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'xen_domain' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > > Which are fixed a bit later by me. Yes, see the above note: "HEAD 394b40f builds fine. It only hurts bisectibility." It still creates a range of not-bisectable commits due to the build error. So the report was sent out, hoping that the branch can be rebased to remove the error completely. However if you've decided that this tree won't do rebase at all, please let me know and I'll ignore such interim errors on it in future. Thanks, Fengguang