Re: [xen:stable/for-linus-3.8 4/8] include/xen/interface/version.h:72:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'xen_domain'

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>]

On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:21:25AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 05:15:10PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 05:38:26AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> > > tree:   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git stable/for-linus-3.8
> > > head:   394b40f62d7ae18a1c48c13fc483b8193f8c3a98
> > > commit: 92e3229dcdc80ff0b6304f14c578d76e7e10e226 [4/8] xen/acpi: ACPI PAD driver
> > > config: x86_64-randconfig-x701 (attached as .config)
> > > 
> > > Note: the xen/stable/for-linus-3.8 HEAD 394b40f builds fine.
> > >       It only hurts bisectibility.
> > > 
> > > All error/warnings:
> > > 
> > > In file included from drivers/xen/features.c:15:0:
> > > include/xen/interface/version.h: In function 'xen_running_on_version_or_later':
> > > include/xen/interface/version.h:72:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'xen_domain' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> > 
> > Which are fixed a bit later by me.
> 
> Yes, see the above note: "HEAD 394b40f builds fine. It only hurts bisectibility."
> 
> It still creates a range of not-bisectable commits due to the build
> error. So the report was sent out, hoping that the branch can be
> rebased to remove the error completely.
> 
> However if you've decided that this tree won't do rebase at all,

Not that one. The 'devel' ones are OK, but the 'stable' are .. well
stable - with warts and all :-)


> please let me know and I'll ignore such interim errors on it in
> future.

I think this is OK. I don't mind seeing such errors.

> 
> Thanks,
> Fengguang