From: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Ensure that the wait ioctl return timeout is valid
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 08:19:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121129081952.0000487c@unknown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121129124217.GK3202@phenom.ffwll.local>
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 13:42:17 +0100
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 07:11:24PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Due to a discrepancy between the sleep time and the amount of time
> > we spend waiting inside the wait_event_timeout, it is possible that
> > we end up computing that negative time remains in the wait_ioctl.
> > This is obviously a bogus result to return to userspace, and
> > triggers a WARN, so we need to fix up the value before propagating
> > it back.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
>
> Ben, can you pls take a look at this and smash an r-b on it if you're
> ok?
>
> Thanks, Daniel
I want the real bug fixed! I do suspect it's a test bug, but I'd
prefer not to slap an r-b on until I can pass the original
problematic test. This just fixes an annoying WARN, which isn't super
important to me because it's not a regression (since it existed since
day 1), and no userspace really cares yet other than IGT.
I did review the patch previously, and it looks fine. So, the r-b is
pending.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-29 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-14 19:11 [PATCH] drm/i915: Ensure that the wait ioctl return timeout is valid Chris Wilson
2012-11-29 12:42 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-11-29 16:19 ` Ben Widawsky [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121129081952.0000487c@unknown \
--to=ben@bwidawsk.net \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.