From: Joe MacDonald <Joe.MacDonald@windriver.com>
To: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: netperf in meta-networking
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 11:34:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121130163410.GP6912@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50B8DC5A.7050203@windriver.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1933 bytes --]
[netperf in meta-networking] On 12.11.30 (Fri 10:18) Mark Hatle wrote:
> I was helping someone with building netperf from meta-networking
> last night, and stumbled on what I think is a bug.
>
> SUMMARY = "A networking benchmarking tool"
> DESCRIPTION = "Network performance benchmark including tests for
> TCP, UDP, sockets, ATM and more."
> SECTION = "console/network"
> HOMEPAGE = "http://www.netperf.org/"
> LICENSE = "netperf"
> LICENSE_FLAGS = "commercial"
>
> In the above, the LICENSE_FLAGS are set to 'commercial'. I think
> this is incorrect. It should be set to 'non-commercial'.
>
> There is a subtle difference between them which is why I think it's a bug...
>
> commercial -- there are some commercial requirements necessary to
> use this recipe in a commercial device... you are responsible for
> understanding them and doing whatever is necessary... (for
> non-commercial devices you can likely use it...)
>
> non-commercial -- this item is restricted to non-commercial users
> only. As in the case of netperf, the license says it's only for
> non-commercial use.
>
> So anyway, my suggestion is to simply change the value of the flag.
Ugh. I had a quick look around and the first thing I found was this:
http://www.netperf.org/svn/netperf4/trunk/include/netperf.h
So I had a look at the netperf source tree fetched by bitbake during a
build. The COPYING file says this:
The enclosed software and documentation includes copyrighted works
of Hewlett-Packard Co. For as long as you comply with the following
limitations, you are hereby authorized to (i) use, reproduce, and
modify the software and documentation, and to (ii) distribute the
software and documentation, including modifications, for
non-commercial purposes only.
So I'm inclined to agree, this sounds like the definition of
non-commercial above to me.
--
-Joe MacDonald.
:wq
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-30 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-30 16:18 netperf in meta-networking Mark Hatle
2012-11-30 16:34 ` Joe MacDonald [this message]
2012-11-30 16:54 ` Joe MacDonald
2012-11-30 16:55 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-11-30 17:11 ` Mark Hatle
2012-11-30 17:56 ` Joe MacDonald
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121130163410.GP6912@windriver.com \
--to=joe.macdonald@windriver.com \
--cc=mark.hatle@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.