All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	James Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com>,
	Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Chanho Min <chanho.min@lge.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 10/13] Make scsi_remove_host() wait for device removal
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 05:45:15 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121202134515.GJ15930@mtj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50B608C1.6080803@acm.org>

Hello, Bart.

On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 01:51:13PM +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> SCSI LLDs may start cleaning up host resources needed by their
> queuecommand() callback as soon as scsi_remove_host() finished.
> Hence scsi_remove_host() must wait until blk_cleanup_queue() for
> all devices associated with the host has finished. That avoids
> that queuecommand() gets invoked after scsi_remove_host()
> finished. Also, avoid adding new SCSI devices after
> scsi_remove_host() started.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Cc: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
> Cc: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/hosts.c      |   30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/scsi/scsi_priv.h  |    1 +
>  drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c |    1 +
>  include/scsi/scsi_host.h  |    1 +
>  4 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
> index 6ae16cd..7bd944e 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
> @@ -150,12 +150,31 @@ int scsi_host_set_state(struct Scsi_Host *shost, enum scsi_host_state state)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_host_set_state);
>  
> +/* Return true if and only if scsi_remove_host() is allowed to finish. */
> +static bool __scsi_remove_host_done(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
> +{
> +	lockdep_assert_held(shost->host_lock);
> +
> +	return list_empty(&shost->__devices);
> +}

This is a preference thing but I usually find this type of trivial
wrappers more obfuscating than actually helpful.  Dunno what James's
preference is tho.

> +/* Test whether scsi_remove_host() may finish, and if so, wake it up. */
> +void __scsi_check_remove_host_done(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
> +{
> +	lockdep_assert_held(shost->host_lock);
> +
> +	if (__scsi_remove_host_done(shost))
> +		wake_up(&shost->remove_host);
> +}

Why the __ prefix?  It's not like they have different
external/internal versions.

This being an one-time thing.  Using completion could be simpler.  e.g.

scsi_check_no_device_left()
{
	if (list_empty(__devices))
		complete(host->no_device_left);
}

scsi_remove_host()
{
	blah blah;
	scsi_check_remove_host_done();
	wait_for_completion(&host->no_device_left);
	blah blah;
}

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-02 13:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-28 12:39 [PATCH 0/13 v6] More device removal fixes Bart Van Assche
2012-11-28 12:42 ` [PATCH v6 01/13] block: Rename queue dead flag Bart Van Assche
2012-11-28 12:43 ` [PATCH v6 02/13] block: Let blk_drain_queue() caller obtain the queue lock Bart Van Assche
2012-11-28 12:44 ` [PATCH v6 03/13] block: Avoid that request_fn is invoked on a dead queue Bart Van Assche
2012-12-02 13:23   ` Tejun Heo
2012-12-02 13:35     ` Bart Van Assche
2012-11-28 12:45 ` [PATCH v6 04/13] block: Avoid scheduling delayed work " Bart Van Assche
2012-12-02 13:26   ` Tejun Heo
2012-12-02 13:41     ` Bart Van Assche
2012-12-02 13:59       ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-28 12:46 ` [PATCH v6 05/13] block: Make blk_cleanup_queue() wait until request_fn finished Bart Van Assche
2012-12-02 13:28   ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-28 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 06/13] bsg: Remove unused function bsg_goose_queue() Bart Van Assche
2012-12-02 13:29   ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-28 12:48 ` [PATCH v6 07/13] Fix race between starved list processing and device removal Bart Van Assche
2012-12-02 13:32   ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-28 12:48 ` [PATCH v6 08/13] Remove get_device() / put_device() pair from scsi_request_fn() Bart Van Assche
2012-12-02 13:34   ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-28 12:50 ` [PATCH v6 09/13] Avoid saving/restoring interrupt state inside scsi_remove_host() Bart Van Assche
2012-12-02 13:35   ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-28 12:51 ` [PATCH v6 10/13] Make scsi_remove_host() wait for device removal Bart Van Assche
2012-12-02 13:45   ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2012-12-02 13:48     ` Tejun Heo
2012-12-03  8:23     ` Bart Van Assche
2012-12-03 16:15       ` Tejun Heo
2012-12-03 16:38         ` Bart Van Assche
2012-12-03 16:42           ` Tejun Heo
2012-12-07  7:41             ` Bart Van Assche
2012-11-28 12:52 ` [PATCH v6 11/13] Make scsi_remove_host() wait until error handling finished Bart Van Assche
2012-12-02 13:51   ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-28 12:53 ` [PATCH v6 12/13] Avoid that scsi_device_set_state() triggers a race Bart Van Assche
2012-12-02 13:53   ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-28 12:53 ` [PATCH v6 13/13] Do not queue new I/O after scsi_remove_host() started Bart Van Assche
2012-12-02 13:58   ` Tejun Heo
2012-12-02 14:02 ` [PATCH 0/13 v6] More device removal fixes Tejun Heo
2012-12-06 13:33 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121202134515.GJ15930@mtj.dyndns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=chanho.min@lge.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.