From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joerg Roedel Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 14:06:45 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] dma_debug: add debug_dma_mapping_error support to architectures that support DMA_DEB Message-Id: <20121202140644.GP30633@8bytes.org> List-Id: References: <1353706142.5270.93.camel@lorien2> <50B34B0F.3080204@samsung.com> In-Reply-To: <50B34B0F.3080204@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Hi Marek, On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:57:19AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > I've took all the patches to the next-dma-debug branch in my tree, I sorry > that You have to wait so long for it. My branch is based on Joerg's > dma-debug branch and I've included it for testing in linux-next branch. The patches are now two times in next. One version from my tree and one from yours. Please remove the version from your tree, the patches should go upstream via my dma-debug branch. Joerg From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Sun, 02 Dec 2012 15:06:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from 8bytes.org ([85.214.48.195]:43795 "EHLO mail.8bytes.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S6823252Ab2LBOGsONhOy (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Dec 2012 15:06:48 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.8bytes.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F7F912AFB8 for ; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 15:06:47 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.8bytes.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1CED212AF14; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 15:06:45 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 15:06:45 +0100 From: Joerg Roedel To: Marek Szyprowski Cc: shuah.khan@hp.com, a-jacquiot@ti.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, lethal@linux-sh.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, ralf@linux-mips.org, tony.luck@intel.com, davem@davemloft.net, msalter@redhat.com, monstr@monstr.eu, Ming Lei , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, LKML , linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, shuahkhan@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] dma_debug: add debug_dma_mapping_error support to architectures that support DMA_DEBUG_API Message-ID: <20121202140644.GP30633@8bytes.org> References: <1353706142.5270.93.camel@lorien2> <50B34B0F.3080204@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50B34B0F.3080204@samsung.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-DSPAM-Result: Whitelisted X-DSPAM-Processed: Sun Dec 2 15:06:47 2012 X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.9989 X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000 X-DSPAM-Signature: 50bb607722971091017827 X-archive-position: 35166 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: joro@8bytes.org Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips Return-Path: Hi Marek, On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:57:19AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > I've took all the patches to the next-dma-debug branch in my tree, I sorry > that You have to wait so long for it. My branch is based on Joerg's > dma-debug branch and I've included it for testing in linux-next branch. The patches are now two times in next. One version from my tree and one from yours. Please remove the version from your tree, the patches should go upstream via my dma-debug branch. Joerg From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.8bytes.org (8bytes.org [IPv6:2a01:238:4242:f000:64f:6c43:3523:e535]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 247822C007D for ; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 01:06:53 +1100 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.8bytes.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 90DAB12AEB5 for ; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 15:06:48 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 15:06:45 +0100 From: Joerg Roedel To: Marek Szyprowski Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] dma_debug: add debug_dma_mapping_error support to architectures that support DMA_DEBUG_API Message-ID: <20121202140644.GP30633@8bytes.org> References: <1353706142.5270.93.camel@lorien2> <50B34B0F.3080204@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <50B34B0F.3080204@samsung.com> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, a-jacquiot@ti.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, Ming Lei , shuahkhan@gmail.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, msalter@redhat.com, shuah.khan@hp.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com, microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, monstr@monstr.eu, tony.luck@intel.com, LKML , ralf@linux-mips.org, lethal@linux-sh.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, davem@davemloft.net List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Marek, On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:57:19AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > I've took all the patches to the next-dma-debug branch in my tree, I sorry > that You have to wait so long for it. My branch is based on Joerg's > dma-debug branch and I've included it for testing in linux-next branch. The patches are now two times in next. One version from my tree and one from yours. Please remove the version from your tree, the patches should go upstream via my dma-debug branch. Joerg From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: joro@8bytes.org (Joerg Roedel) Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 15:06:45 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 0/9] dma_debug: add debug_dma_mapping_error support to architectures that support DMA_DEBUG_API In-Reply-To: <50B34B0F.3080204@samsung.com> References: <1353706142.5270.93.camel@lorien2> <50B34B0F.3080204@samsung.com> Message-ID: <20121202140644.GP30633@8bytes.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Marek, On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:57:19AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > I've took all the patches to the next-dma-debug branch in my tree, I sorry > that You have to wait so long for it. My branch is based on Joerg's > dma-debug branch and I've included it for testing in linux-next branch. The patches are now two times in next. One version from my tree and one from yours. Please remove the version from your tree, the patches should go upstream via my dma-debug branch. Joerg