All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] netfilter: nf_conntrack: improve nf_conn object traceability
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 13:50:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121203125036.GA30523@1984> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121203110610.GA11627@breakpoint.cc>

On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 12:06:10PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> pablo@netfilter.org <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Pablo,
> 
> I have one question related to ct object destruction: 
> 
> > @@ -247,6 +245,9 @@ void nf_ct_delete_from_lists(struct nf_conn *ct)
> >  	 * Otherwise we can get spurious warnings. */
> >  	NF_CT_STAT_INC(net, delete_list);
> >  	clean_from_lists(ct);
> > +	/* add this conntrack to the dying list */
> > +	hlist_nulls_add_head(&ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL].hnnode,
> > +			     &net->ct.dying);
> >  	spin_unlock_bh(&nf_conntrack_lock);
> 
> i.o.w., conntrack objects that were in hash table are now always moved
> to the dying list.  Shouldn't nf_ct_release_dying_list() be adjusted,
> too?  It still seems to assume that the dying list only contains
> alive conntack objects whose events have not been delivered yet.

I see, you mean that nf_ct_release_dying_list should delete objects
from the dying list. Yes, I'll fix that. Thanks for the spot.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-03 12:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-29 13:51 [PATCH 0/2] improve conntrack object traceability pablo
2012-11-29 13:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] netfilter: nf_conntrack: improve nf_conn " pablo
2012-12-03 11:06   ` Florian Westphal
2012-12-03 12:50     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2012-12-03 13:28       ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-12-03 14:17         ` Florian Westphal
2012-12-03 14:33           ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-11-29 13:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] netfilter: ctnetlink: dump entries from the dying and unconfirmed lists pablo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121203125036.GA30523@1984 \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.