From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCHSET cgroup/for-3.8] cpuset: decouple cpuset locking from cgroup core Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 08:53:38 -0800 Message-ID: <20121203165338.GF19802@htj.dyndns.org> References: <1354138460-19286-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <20121203152205.GB17093@dhcp22.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Ko3n59VEHSCUHHl5vJB0050vxB0oQfiLCeiWF0a1kgc=; b=Gm+H1kBpNoCMvAmeycM8J7GWjSCctwLiXtkBS64JkqNzts7/qotUfLxIM9OU9bCcYS wyj2rsHO6B0MT+s0RRZDl7MwkftVRHVDaIBC3w5iYWC9XX8OJQ6vo1cYMbIFmPEZwgPJ jVpv+x6CB8rUW91MvRXx7Y28DWHfv8T2z7TRvaCLQe699mWXUTw3hNIRApg6L8zeeQUW 2wA17RA5WAJj+ttqjjEPCGXA/TnVqTcxHwr4DsTcaYJRxVHoEEyswpfKUpTuAgU/ahuS zk0c+kksZC4pUNPCHVUYtENhGuKw0N9uHGDe7EUWDucCBACF2nJvubTmuEGOxNLBw5D6 HFPQ== Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121203152205.GB17093@dhcp22.suse.cz> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Michal Hocko Cc: lizefan@huawei.com, paul@paulmenage.org, glommer@parallels.com, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, bsingharora@gmail.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, Michal. On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 04:22:05PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > I have glanced through the series and spotten nothing obviously wrong. I > do not feel I could give my r-b because I am not familiar with cpusets > internals enough and some patches looks quite scary (like #8). > Anyway the resulting outcome seems nice. Thanks a lot for looking at it and, yeah, it's a bit scary. Li, Paul, can you guys please review the series? Thanks! -- tejun -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755419Ab2LCQxq (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2012 11:53:46 -0500 Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:36462 "EHLO mail-pb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754884Ab2LCQxo (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2012 11:53:44 -0500 Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 08:53:38 -0800 From: Tejun Heo To: Michal Hocko Cc: lizefan@huawei.com, paul@paulmenage.org, glommer@parallels.com, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, bsingharora@gmail.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHSET cgroup/for-3.8] cpuset: decouple cpuset locking from cgroup core Message-ID: <20121203165338.GF19802@htj.dyndns.org> References: <1354138460-19286-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <20121203152205.GB17093@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121203152205.GB17093@dhcp22.suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, Michal. On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 04:22:05PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > I have glanced through the series and spotten nothing obviously wrong. I > do not feel I could give my r-b because I am not familiar with cpusets > internals enough and some patches looks quite scary (like #8). > Anyway the resulting outcome seems nice. Thanks a lot for looking at it and, yeah, it's a bit scary. Li, Paul, can you guys please review the series? Thanks! -- tejun