From: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 14/18] regulatory: clarify locking rules and assertions
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 14:07:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121204190730.GC29880@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1354632540-21207-15-git-send-email-johannes@sipsolutions.net>
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 03:48:56PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Many places that currently check that cfg80211_
> The function needs to hold the cfg80211_mutex as
> it uses the global cfg80211_regdomain variable, so
> add the lock assertion to it and fix one of the
> callers that doesn't hold that mutex.
Something missing in the description there?
--
Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-04 19:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-04 14:48 regulatory cleanups & fixes Johannes Berg
2012-12-04 14:48 ` [RFC v2 01/18] regulatory: don't allocate too much memory Johannes Berg
2012-12-04 14:48 ` [RFC v2 02/18] regulatory: clean up reg_copy_regd() Johannes Berg
2012-12-04 14:48 ` [RFC v2 03/18] regulatory: don't test list before iterating Johannes Berg
2012-12-04 14:48 ` [RFC v2 04/18] regulatory: simplify regulatory_hint_11d Johannes Berg
2012-12-04 14:48 ` [RFC v2 05/18] regulatory: code cleanup Johannes Berg
2012-12-04 14:48 ` [RFC v2 06/18] regulatory: remove useless locking on exit Johannes Berg
2012-12-04 14:48 ` [RFC v2 07/18] regulatory: use proper enum for return values Johannes Berg
2012-12-04 14:48 ` [RFC v2 08/18] cfg80211: remove wiphy_idx_valid Johannes Berg
2012-12-04 14:48 ` [RFC v2 09/18] regulatory: remove BUG_ON Johannes Berg
2012-12-04 14:48 ` [RFC v2 10/18] regulatory: simplify restore_regulatory_settings Johannes Berg
2012-12-04 14:48 ` [RFC v2 11/18] regulatory: remove redundant isalpha() check Johannes Berg
2012-12-04 14:48 ` [RFC v2 12/18] regulatory: remove useless warning Johannes Berg
2012-12-04 14:48 ` [RFC v2 13/18] regulatory: simplify freq_reg_info_regd Johannes Berg
2012-12-04 14:48 ` [RFC v2 14/18] regulatory: clarify locking rules and assertions Johannes Berg
2012-12-04 19:07 ` Bob Copeland [this message]
2012-12-05 9:13 ` Johannes Berg
2012-12-04 14:48 ` [RFC v2 15/18] regulatory: remove locking from wiphy_apply_custom_regulatory Johannes Berg
2012-12-04 14:48 ` [RFC v2 16/18] regulatory: fix reg_is_valid_request handling Johannes Berg
2012-12-04 14:48 ` [RFC v2 17/18] regulatory: remove handling of channel bandwidth Johannes Berg
2012-12-04 14:49 ` [RFC v2 18/18] regulatory: allow arbitrary channel widths Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121204190730.GC29880@localhost \
--to=me@bobcopeland.com \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.