From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steffen Klassert Subject: Re: [Patch net-next] xfrm: add missing xfrm message types to selinux perm table Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 08:39:41 +0100 Message-ID: <20121205073941.GA18940@secunet.com> References: <1354599571-6181-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> <20121204.130257.1178992077066719400.davem@davemloft.net> <20121205054152.GO22290@secunet.com> <1354690585.28951.10.camel@cr0> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au To: Cong Wang Return-path: Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([195.81.216.161]:50267 "EHLO a.mx.secunet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751737Ab2LEHjr (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Dec 2012 02:39:47 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1354690585.28951.10.camel@cr0> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 02:56:25PM +0800, Cong Wang wrote: > On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 06:41 +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 01:02:57PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > > > From: Cong Wang > > > Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 13:39:31 +0800 > > > > > > > Cc: Steffen Klassert > > > > Cc: Herbert Xu > > > > Cc: "David S. Miller" > > > > Signed-off-by: Cong Wang > > > > > > Steffen will you take this into your IPSEC tree? > > > > > > > I would do so, but I have not seen this patch by now. > > Was it really send to me? I have not even seen it on the > > netdev list. > > > > Anyway, I don't have it, please resend. > > > > Weird, you are already Cc'ed in the original patch, Cc: Steffen Klassert > . > Even patchwork does not list this patch, I can only guess that something went wrong with your submission. Please resend it, Thanks.