All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand: mxs: reset BCH earlier to avoid NAND startup problems
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 19:42:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121205184210.GA9329@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121205183732.GK10369@pengutronix.de>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1038 bytes --]

On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 07:37:32PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 03:53:53PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > It could happen (1 out of 100 times) that NAND did not start up
> > correctly after warm rebooting, so barebox could not find its
> > environment or DMA timed out due to a stalled BCH. When resetting BCH
> > together with GPMI, the issue could not be observed anymore. We probably
> > need the consistent state already before sending commands to NAND.
> 
> The subject suggests that the BCH engine is resetted earlier, but
> instead of moving the reset this patch adds another reset. Is this
> intended?

Yes, I wanted to keep resetting BCH before applying a new layout. Maybe
the subject should have been named "earlier, too,". I can drop the other
check and rerun my tests if this seems overcautios to you.

Thanks,

   Wolfram

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 149 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-05 18:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-05 14:53 [PATCH] mtd: nand: mxs: reset BCH earlier to avoid NAND startup problems Wolfram Sang
2012-12-05 18:37 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-12-05 18:42   ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2012-12-05 18:50     ` Sascha Hauer
2012-12-05 19:02       ` [PATCH V2] mtd: nand: mxs: reset BCH earlier, too, " Wolfram Sang
2012-12-06  7:43         ` Sascha Hauer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121205184210.GA9329@pengutronix.de \
    --to=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.