From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mondschein.lichtvoll.de ([194.150.191.11]:57982 "EHLO mail.lichtvoll.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1946805Ab2LFSws (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2012 13:52:48 -0500 From: Martin Steigerwald To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, sander@humilis.net Subject: Re: Question about btrfs snapshot delay and rm -rf delay Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 19:52:46 +0100 Cc: Sylvain Alain References: <20121206125908.GA31070@panda> (sfid-20121206_140135_041351_D66DE731) In-Reply-To: <20121206125908.GA31070@panda> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <201212061952.46519.Martin@lichtvoll.de> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am Donnerstag, 6. Dezember 2012 schrieb Sander: > Sylvain Alain wrote (ao): > > Hi, right now I own this SSD : > > > > Intel SSD 520 Series MLC 120 Gigs > > > Also, this is my /etc/fstab > > /dev/sda3 /boot ext2 noauto,noatime,defaults > > /dev/sda1 /boot/efi vfat noauto,defaults > > /dev/sda4 / btrfs > > SSDs are sensitive to partitioning. Easiest is not to partition at all. Huh? How so? My Intel SSD 320 is partitioned and uses LVM in the biggest partition and is still just fine after 19 month. Media wearout indicator still at 100 (of 100). Thanks, -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7