From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mondschein.lichtvoll.de ([194.150.191.11]:58623 "EHLO mail.lichtvoll.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1946816Ab2LFSzN (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2012 13:55:13 -0500 From: Martin Steigerwald To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Question about btrfs snapshot delay and rm -rf delay Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 19:55:11 +0100 Cc: sander@humilis.net, Sylvain Alain References: <20121206125908.GA31070@panda> <201212061952.46519.Martin@lichtvoll.de> (sfid-20121206_195408_174122_0A12B8B8) In-Reply-To: <201212061952.46519.Martin@lichtvoll.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <201212061955.11919.Martin@lichtvoll.de> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am Donnerstag, 6. Dezember 2012 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > Am Donnerstag, 6. Dezember 2012 schrieb Sander: > > Sylvain Alain wrote (ao): > > > Hi, right now I own this SSD : > > > > > > Intel SSD 520 Series MLC 120 Gigs > > > > > Also, this is my /etc/fstab > > > /dev/sda3 /boot ext2 noauto,noatime,defaults > > > /dev/sda1 /boot/efi vfat noauto,defaults > > > /dev/sda4 / btrfs > > > > SSDs are sensitive to partitioning. Easiest is not to partition at all. > > Huh? How so? > > My Intel SSD 320 is partitioned and uses LVM in the biggest partition > and is still just fine after 19 month. Media wearout indicator still at 100 > (of 100). Or did you indirectly refer to partition alignment? -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7