All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dm-ioctl: fix unsafe use of dm_ioctl.data_size
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 21:22:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121206212216.GJ6834@agk.fab.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1211221919540.11244@file.rdu.redhat.com>

I don't think we need to support the situation when the value changes during
the copying of the parameters, so how about something more like this instead?

Alasdair


From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>

Abort dm ioctl processing if userspace changes the data_size parameter
after we validated it but before we finished copying the data buffer
from userspace.

The dm ioctl parameters are processed in the following sequence:
 1. ctl_ioctl() calls copy_params();
 2. copy_params() makes a first copy of the fixed-sized portion of the
    userspace parameters into the local variable "tmp";
 3. copy_params() then validates tmp.data_size and allocates a new
    structure big enough to hold the complete data and copies the whole
    userspace buffer there;
 4. ctl_ioctl() reads userspace data the second time and copies the whole
    buffer into the pointer "param";
 5. ctl_ioctl() reads param->data_size without any validation and stores it
    in the variable "input_param_size";
 6. "input_param_size" is further used as the authoritative size of the
    kernel buffer.

The problem is that userspace code could change the contents of user
memory between steps 2 and 4.  In particular, the data_size parameter
can be changed to an invalid value after the kernel has validated it.
This lets userspace force the kernel to access invalid kernel memory.

The fix is to ensure that the size has not changed at step 4.

This patch shouldn't have a security impact because CAP_SYS_ADMIN is
required to run this code, but it should be fixed anyway.

Reported-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org

---
 drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c |    8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

Index: linux/drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c
+++ linux/drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c
@@ -1566,6 +1566,14 @@ static int copy_params(struct dm_ioctl _
 	if (copy_from_user(dmi, user, tmp.data_size))
 		goto bad;
 
+	/*
+	 * Abort if something changed the ioctl data while it was being copied.
+	 */
+	if (dmi->data_size != tmp.data_size) {
+		DMERR("rejecting ioctl: data size modified while processing parameters");
+		goto bad;
+	}
+
 	/* Wipe the user buffer so we do not return it to userspace */
 	if (secure_data && clear_user(user, tmp.data_size))
 		goto bad;

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-12-06 21:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-23  0:19 [PATCH 1/3] dm-ioctl: don't use PF_MEMALLOC Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-23  0:20 ` [PATCH 2/3] dm-ioctl: fix unsafe use of dm_ioctl.data_size Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-23  0:21   ` [PATCH 3/3] dm-ioctl: use kmalloc if possible Mikulas Patocka
2012-12-06 21:22   ` Alasdair G Kergon [this message]
2012-12-06 23:30     ` [PATCH 2/3] dm-ioctl: fix unsafe use of dm_ioctl.data_size Mike Snitzer
2012-12-07  2:53     ` Mikulas Patocka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121206212216.GJ6834@agk.fab.redhat.com \
    --to=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.