From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: add Haswell LPSS devices to acpi_platform_device_ids list Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 11:01:26 +0000 Message-ID: <20121207110126.53cd97e7@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> References: <1354874882-1162-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk ([81.2.110.251]:56290 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752109Ab2LGK4J (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Dec 2012 05:56:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1354874882-1162-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Mika Westerberg Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 7 Dec 2012 12:08:02 +0200 Mika Westerberg wrote: > All devices behind Haswell LPSS (Low Power Subsystem) should be represented > as platform devices What about the bus heirarchy ? What about making sure they appear in the PCI resource heirarchy so we don't mash them up if we reassign or allocate other resources on the bus ? Alan