From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: add Haswell LPSS devices to acpi_platform_device_ids list Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 11:29:43 +0000 Message-ID: <20121207112943.031df929@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> References: <1354874882-1162-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <20121207110126.53cd97e7@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> <20121207111415.GH23611@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk ([81.2.110.251]:56329 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932732Ab2LGLYc (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Dec 2012 06:24:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20121207111415.GH23611@intel.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Mika Westerberg Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I'm not sure if I understand what you mean here. > > We put them in hierarchy if the parent ACPI node has also a physical device > bound to it (like PCIe root port). Ok