From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] stubdom: Change vTPM shared page ABI Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 16:25:37 -0500 Message-ID: <20121207212536.GE9664@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <50B4D060.9070403@jhuapl.edu> <1354029286-17652-1-git-send-email-dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov> <1354029286-17652-2-git-send-email-dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov> <50B76DBB.90504@jhuapl.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50B76DBB.90504@jhuapl.edu> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Matthew Fioravante Cc: Daniel De Graaf , "Ian.Campbell@citrix.com" , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > >+ snprintf(path, 512, "backend/vtpm/%u/%u/feature-protocol-v2", (unsigned int) tpmif->domid, tpmif->handle); > >+ if ((err = xenbus_write(XBT_NIL, path, "1"))) > >+ { > >+ /* if we got an error here we should carefully remove the interface and then return */ > >+ TPMBACK_ERR("Unable to write feature-protocol-v2 node: %s\n", err); > >+ free(err); > >+ remove_tpmif(tpmif); > >+ goto error_post_irq; > >+ } > >+ > My preference is still to do away with the versioning stuff since > tpm is just getting released. Its not even in linux yet so there is > no confusion. We can even merge the linux patches together and > resubmit as one if thats preferrable. Konrad, Ian, your final votes > on that? I am up for just removing the versioning stuff - and if one really wants to be fool-proof - rename the 'backend/vtpm' to 'backend/vtpm2' Perhaps?