From: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>
To: Gabor Juhos <juhosg@openwrt.org>
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] p54: zero-out rx_status
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:08:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201212111608.43293.chunkeey@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1355234105-12013-3-git-send-email-juhosg@openwrt.org>
On Tuesday, December 11, 2012 02:55:05 PM Gabor Juhos wrote:
> In commit 'mac80211: support radiotap vendor namespace RX data'
> new fields were added to 'struct ieee80211_rx_status'.
> The ath5k driver does not initializes those fields and
^^^^^ p54?!
> this can cause unexpected behaviour. The patch ensures
> that each field gets initialized with zeroes.
Actually, when the skb is alloced/initialized by
__alloc_skb, the skb->cb is already zeroed (which
is where the ieee80211_rx_status will be stored).
And while p54 recycles command response skbs, the
driver does not touch the skb->cb of 802.11 skbs,
until the frame is destined for ieee80211_rx_irqsave.
If this issue just popped up now, I suspect that
something else is silently corrupting our SKBs
[or can anybody see how rt2x00 hit this issue?]
> Cc: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gabor Juhos <juhosg@openwrt.org>
> ---
> Compile tested only.
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/p54/txrx.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/p54/txrx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/p54/txrx.c
> index 12f0a34..be2552e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/p54/txrx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/p54/txrx.c
> @@ -345,6 +345,8 @@ static int p54_rx_data(struct p54_common *priv, struct sk_buff *skb)
> if (!(hdr->flags & cpu_to_le16(P54_HDR_FLAG_DATA_IN_FCS_GOOD)))
> return 0;
>
> + memset(rx_status, 0, sizeof(*rx_status));
> +
> if (hdr->decrypt_status == P54_DECRYPT_OK)
> rx_status->flag |= RX_FLAG_DECRYPTED;
> if ((hdr->decrypt_status == P54_DECRYPT_FAIL_MICHAEL) ||
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-11 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-11 13:55 [PATCH 1/3] rt2x00: zero-out rx_status Gabor Juhos
2012-12-11 13:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] ath5k: " Gabor Juhos
2012-12-11 13:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] p54: " Gabor Juhos
2012-12-11 15:08 ` Christian Lamparter [this message]
2012-12-11 15:25 ` Johannes Berg
2012-12-11 15:30 ` Johannes Berg
2012-12-11 15:38 ` Christian Lamparter
2012-12-11 17:19 ` Gabor Juhos
2012-12-11 17:16 ` Gabor Juhos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201212111608.43293.chunkeey@googlemail.com \
--to=chunkeey@googlemail.com \
--cc=juhosg@openwrt.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.