From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [[PATCH v9 3/3] 1/1] virtio_console: Remove buffers from out_vq
	at port removal
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:42:28 +0530
Message-ID: <20121212121228.GA22521@amit.redhat.com>
References: <029d7029bc1186fbd2ec74123dc88922b9600660.1352366215.git.amit.shah@redhat.com>
	<87ip96id3a.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
	<20121210055401.GA17187@amit.redhat.com>
	<871uexec7e.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
	<20121211041012.GA16297@amit.redhat.com>
	<87wqwo3zr3.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87wqwo3zr3.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/virtualization>,
	<mailto:virtualization-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/>
List-Post: <mailto:virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:virtualization-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization>,
	<mailto:virtualization-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org
Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, sjur@brendeland.net, linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com, Sjur =?iso-8859-1?Q?Br=E6ndeland?= <sjur.brandeland@stericsson.com>
List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org

On (Wed) 12 Dec 2012 [10:31:04], Rusty Russell wrote:
> Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> writes:
> =

> > On (Tue) 11 Dec 2012 [09:39:41], Rusty Russell wrote:
> >> Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> writes:
> >> =

> >> > On (Fri) 16 Nov 2012 [11:22:09], Rusty Russell wrote:
> >> >> Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> writes:
> >> >> > From: Sjur Br=E6ndeland <sjur.brandeland@stericsson.com>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Remove buffers from the out-queue when a port is removed. Rproc_s=
erial
> >> >> > communicates with remote processors that may crash and leave buff=
ers in
> >> >> > the out-queue. The virtio serial ports may have buffers in the ou=
t-queue
> >> >> > as well, e.g. for non-blocking ports and the host didn't consume =
them
> >> >> > yet.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > [Amit: Remove WARN_ON for generic ports case.]
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Sjur Br=E6ndeland <sjur.brandeland@stericsson.com>
> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
> >> >> =

> >> >> I already have this in my pending queue; I've promoted it to my
> >> >> virtio-next branch now.
> >> >
> >> > Rusty, I still see this series in your pending queue, not in
> >> > virtio-next.  Did anything change in the meantime?
> >> =

> >> Hmm:
> >> =

> >> 40e625ac50f40d87ddba93280d0a503425aa68e9?
> >
> > I'm sorry, I meant the remoteproc code, not this patch.
> =

> Still waiting for v9, AFIACT?

Instead of sending all patches marked v9, just this patch was
re-spun.  I think you can just pick up patches 1 and 2 from v8 (they
have my acked-by), and patch 3 was an earlier version of this one,
which should just be dropped.

		Amit